Suppr超能文献

口服抗生素肠道准备可显著降低择期结直肠手术的手术部位感染率和再入院率。

Oral Antibiotic Bowel Preparation Significantly Reduces Surgical Site Infection Rates and Readmission Rates in Elective Colorectal Surgery.

机构信息

Department of Surgery at the University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL.

出版信息

Ann Surg. 2015 Jun;261(6):1034-40. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001125.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the relationship between oral antibiotic bowel preparation (OABP) and surgical site infection (SSI) rates in a national colectomy cohort.

BACKGROUND

OABP for elective colorectal surgery has fallen out of favor. Large cohort studies show that OABP is associated with a 50% reduction in SSI after colectomy.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program colectomy cohort from 2011 to 2012 was performed to examine the association between use of OABP and outcomes of SSI, length of stay (LOS), and readmission after elective colectomy. Univariate and multivariable analyses for SSI were performed.

RESULTS

The cohort included 8415 colorectal operations of which 5291 (62.9%) had a minimally invasive surgical (MIS) approach. Overall, 25.6% had no bowel preparation, 44.9% had mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) only, and 29.5% received OABP. The SSI rate was 11.1%, and it varied by preparation type: 14.9% no preparation, 12.0% MBP, and 6.5% OABP (P < 0.001). OABP group had significantly shorter hospital LOS: (median = 4, interquartile range: 3-6) versus other preparations (median LOS = 5) (P < 0.001). Readmission rates were lowest in OABP (8.1%) and highest in the no preparation group (11.8%). Multivariable logistic regressions found OABP associated with lower SSI [adjusted odds ratio (ORadj) = 0.46, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.36-0.59]. Stratified models found OABP protective for SSI for both open procedures (ORadj = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.30-0.53) and MIS procedures (ORadj = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.36-0.65).

CONCLUSIONS

OABP is associated with reduced SSI rates, shorter LOS, and fewer readmissions. Adoption of OABP before elective colectomy would reduce SSI without effecting LOS. The practice of MBP alone should be abandoned.

摘要

目的

在全国结肠切除术队列中确定口服抗生素肠道准备(OABP)与手术部位感染(SSI)发生率之间的关系。

背景

择期结直肠手术的 OABP 已不再流行。大型队列研究表明,OABP 可使结肠切除术后 SSI 降低 50%。

方法

对 2011 年至 2012 年国家手术质量改进计划结肠切除术队列进行回顾性分析,以检查 OABP 的使用与 SSI、住院时间(LOS)和择期结肠切除术后再入院的结果之间的关系。对 SSI 进行单变量和多变量分析。

结果

该队列包括 8415 例结肠手术,其中 5291 例(62.9%)采用微创外科(MIS)方法。总体而言,25.6%没有肠道准备,44.9%仅接受机械肠道准备(MBP),29.5%接受 OABP。SSI 发生率为 11.1%,且因准备类型而异:无准备组为 14.9%,MBP 组为 12.0%,OABP 组为 6.5%(P<0.001)。OABP 组的住院 LOS 明显更短:(中位数=4,四分位距:3-6)与其他准备组(中位数 LOS=5)(P<0.001)。再入院率以 OABP 组最低(8.1%),无准备组最高(11.8%)。多变量逻辑回归发现 OABP 与较低的 SSI 相关[调整后的优势比(ORadj)=0.46,95%置信区间(CI):0.36-0.59]。分层模型发现 OABP 对开放手术(ORadj=0.40,95%CI:0.30-0.53)和 MIS 手术(ORadj=0.48,95%CI:0.36-0.65)均具有保护作用。

结论

OABP 与降低 SSI 率、缩短 LOS 和减少再入院相关。在择期结肠切除术之前采用 OABP 将降低 SSI,而不会影响 LOS。单独使用 MBP 的做法应该被摒弃。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验