Suppr超能文献

皮下植入式心律转复除颤器——当前的证据与挑战

The subcutaneous ICD-current evidence and challenges.

作者信息

Patel Kiran Haresh Kumar, Lambiase Pier D

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, The Heart Hospital, University College London, London W1G 8PH, UK.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2014 Dec;4(6):449-59. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2223-3652.2014.12.02.

Abstract

The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) represents an exciting development in ICD technology. It has relative advantages over traditional transvenous systems, particularly for young patients in whom the lifetime risk of device-related complications may be deemed to be unacceptably high. While data relating to device longevity and long term safety profile is yet to be accrued, several recent studies have demonstrated good clinical efficacy comparable to transvenous ICDs. Indeed, new techniques have also been developed to simplify the S-ICD implantation procedure and attempts have been made to address challenges pertaining to T-wave oversensing to reduce the delivery of inappropriate shocks. The impact of inappropriate shocks and lack of anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP) function are not only contentious matters, but also have important implications for patients in whom the S-ICD would be suitable. It is envisaged that subsequent models of this device will be less cumbersome, with the possibility that an entirely leadless pacemaker-defibrillator will one day be possible. Although the S-ICD may not completely replace transvenous devices in its current form, evidence suggests that it is a viable alternative particularly in preventing sudden cardiac death in non-pacing dependent patients.

摘要

皮下植入式心律转复除颤器(S-ICD)是ICD技术一项令人振奋的进展。与传统经静脉系统相比,它具有相对优势,对于年轻患者而言,与设备相关并发症的终身风险可能被认为高得不可接受。虽然有关设备寿命和长期安全性的数据尚未积累,但最近的几项研究已证明其临床疗效良好,与经静脉ICD相当。事实上,还开发了新技术来简化S-ICD植入程序,并已尝试应对与T波过度感知相关的挑战,以减少不适当电击的发放。不适当电击的影响以及缺乏抗心动过速起搏(ATP)功能不仅是有争议的问题,而且对适合使用S-ICD的患者也有重要影响。可以设想,该设备的后续型号将不那么笨重,并且有可能有朝一日实现完全无导线的起搏器-除颤器。尽管S-ICD目前的形式可能无法完全取代经静脉设备,但有证据表明它是一种可行的替代方案,特别是在预防非起搏依赖患者的心源性猝死方面。

相似文献

1
The subcutaneous ICD-current evidence and challenges.
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2014 Dec;4(6):449-59. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2223-3652.2014.12.02.
4
Eligibility of Pacemaker Patients for Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2017 May;28(5):544-548. doi: 10.1111/jce.13182. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
5
Long-Term Experience With the Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator in Teenagers and Young Adults.
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2017 Dec 26;3(13):1499-1506. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2017.08.017. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
6
The need for a subsequent transvenous system in patients implanted with subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.
Heart Rhythm. 2022 Dec;19(12):1958-1964. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2022.06.030. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
7
Recent advances in the entirely subcutaneous ICD System.
F1000Prime Rep. 2015 Apr 2;7:46. doi: 10.12703/P7-46. eCollection 2015.
8
Subcutaneous Versus Transvenous Implantable Defibrillator Therapy: A Meta-Analysis of Case-Control Studies.
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2017 Dec 26;3(13):1475-1483. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2017.07.017. Epub 2017 Sep 27.
9
Subcutaneous and Transvenous ICDs: an Update on Contemporary Questions and Controversies.
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2022 Aug;24(8):947-958. doi: 10.1007/s11886-022-01712-6. Epub 2022 May 31.
10
Usefulness of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy in patients with Brugada syndrome.
Heart Vessels. 2021 Feb;36(2):260-266. doi: 10.1007/s00380-020-01683-0. Epub 2020 Aug 24.

引用本文的文献

2
Device Therapy for Sudden Cardiac Death Prophylaxis After Acute Coronary Syndrome: When and Why?
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2020 Jan 16;22(1):4. doi: 10.1007/s11886-020-1255-0.
3
Comparative outcomes of subcutaneous and transvenous cardioverter-defibrillators.
Chin Med J (Engl). 2019 Mar 20;132(6):631-637. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000000133.
4
Sudden cardiac death in the young: a genetic destiny?
Clin Med (Lond). 2018 Apr 1;18(Suppl 2):s17-s23. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.18-2-s17.
7
Clinical and electrocardiographic predictors of T wave oversensing in patients with subcutaneous ICD.
J Arrhythm. 2016 Jun;32(3):181-5. doi: 10.1016/j.joa.2016.01.002. Epub 2016 Feb 5.
8
[The subcutaneous cardioverter-defibrillator: When less is more].
Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2015 Jun;26(2):123-8. doi: 10.1007/s00399-015-0378-2. Epub 2015 Jun 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Early experience with the subcutaneous ICD.
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2014 Aug;16(8):516. doi: 10.1007/s11886-014-0516-1.
2
Use of an electrocardiographic screening tool to determine candidacy for a subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.
Heart Rhythm. 2014 Aug;11(8):1361-6. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.04.025. Epub 2014 Apr 19.
3
Use of a discrimination algorithm to reduce inappropriate shocks with a subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.
Heart Rhythm. 2014 Aug;11(8):1352-8. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.04.012. Epub 2014 Apr 13.
4
Worldwide experience with a totally subcutaneous implantable defibrillator: early results from the EFFORTLESS S-ICD Registry.
Eur Heart J. 2014 Jul 1;35(25):1657-65. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu112. Epub 2014 Mar 26.
5
Permanent leadless cardiac pacing: results of the LEADLESS trial.
Circulation. 2014 Apr 8;129(14):1466-71. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.006987. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
6
Who should receive the subcutaneous implanted defibrillator?: Timing is not right to replace the transvenous implantable cardioverter defibrillator.
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013 Dec;6(6):1246-51; discussion 1251. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.113.000445.
9
Which patients are not suitable for a subcutaneous ICD: incidence and predictors of failed QRS-T-wave morphology screening.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014 May;25(5):494-499. doi: 10.1111/jce.12343. Epub 2014 Jan 7.
10
Association between myocardial substrate, implantable cardioverter defibrillator shocks and mortality in MADIT-CRT.
Eur Heart J. 2014 Jan;35(2):106-15. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht451. Epub 2013 Oct 31.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验