Sin Della Wai-Mei, Wong Yee-Lok, Cheng Eddie Chung-Chin, Lo Man-Fung, Ho Clare, Mok Chuen-Shing, Wong Siu-Kay
Government Laboratory, 7/F., Ho Man Tin Government Offices, 88 Chung Hau Street, Ho Man Tin, Kowloon, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Anal Bioanal Chem. 2015 Apr;407(11):3009-21. doi: 10.1007/s00216-015-8455-2. Epub 2015 Jan 27.
This paper presents the certification of alpha-endosulfan, beta-endosulfan, and endosulfan sulfate in a candidate tea certified reference material (code: GLHK-11-03) according to the requirements of the ISO Guide 30 series. Certification of GLHK-11-03 was based on an analytical method purposely developed for the accurate measurement of the mass fraction of the target analytes in the material. An isotope dilution mass spectrometry (IDMS) method involving determination by (i) gas chromatography-negative chemical ionization-mass spectrometry (GC-NCI-MS) and (ii) gas chromatography-electron ionization-high-resolution mass spectrometry (GC-EI-HRMS) techniques was employed. The performance of the described method was demonstrated through participation in the key comparison CCQM-K95 "Mid-Polarity Analytes in Food Matrix: Mid-Polarity Pesticides in Tea" organized by the Consultative Committee for Amount of Substance-Metrology in Chemistry in 2012, where the study material was the same as the certified reference material (CRM). The values reported by using the developed method were in good agreement with the key comparison reference value (KCRV) assigned for beta-endosulfan (727 ± 14 μg kg(-1)) and endosulfan sulfate (505 ± 11 μg kg(-1)), where the degree of equivalence (DoE) values were 0.41 and 0.40, respectively. The certified values of alpha-endosulfan, beta-endosulfan, and endosulfan sulfate in dry mass fraction in GLHK-11-03 were 350, 730, and 502 μg kg(-1), respectively, and the respective expanded uncertainties, due to sample inhomogeneity, long-term and short-term stability, and variability in the characterization procedure, were 27 μg kg(-1) (7.8 %), 48 μg kg(-1) (6.6 %), and 33 μg kg(-1) (6.6 %).
本文根据ISO指南30系列的要求,对一种候选茶叶标准物质(编号:GLHK - 11 - 03)中的α - 硫丹、β - 硫丹和硫丹硫酸酯进行了定值。GLHK - 11 - 03的定值基于专门为准确测量该物质中目标分析物的质量分数而开发的分析方法。采用了一种同位素稀释质谱法(IDMS),该方法包括通过(i)气相色谱 - 负化学电离 - 质谱法(GC - NCI - MS)和(ii)气相色谱 - 电子电离 - 高分辨率质谱法(GC - EI - HRMS)技术进行测定。通过参与2012年由化学计量学咨询委员会组织的关键比对CCQM - K95“食品基质中的中极性分析物:茶叶中的中极性农药”,证明了所述方法的性能,其中研究物质与标准物质(CRM)相同。使用所开发方法报告的值与为β - 硫丹(727 ± 14 μg kg⁻¹)和硫丹硫酸酯(505 ± 11 μg kg⁻¹)指定的关键比对参考值(KCRV)高度一致,其中等效度(DoE)值分别为0.41和0.40。GLHK - 11 - 03中α - 硫丹、β - 硫丹和硫丹硫酸酯干质量分数的认定值分别为350、730和502 μg kg⁻¹,由于样品不均匀性、长期和短期稳定性以及定值过程中的变异性导致的各自扩展不确定度分别为27 μg kg⁻¹(7.8%)、48 μg kg⁻¹(6.6%)和33 μg kg⁻¹(6.6%)。