Anand Veluswamy, Kumaran B R, Chenniappan S
Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, MCV Memorial ENT Trust Hospital, 115, Palaghat Road, Pollachi, 642001 TN India.
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Mar;67(Suppl 1):40-6. doi: 10.1007/s12070-014-0740-4. Epub 2014 Jun 17.
To compare the functional results between posterior cordotomy, cordoplasty and external procedure in managing bilateral vocal cord paralysis in one of the largest published study group. Retrospective and comparative study. 54 patients with bilateral vocal cord paralysis who underwent posterior cordotomy (Group-I), cordoplasty (Group-II) and external procedure (Group-III) from 2001 to 2013 were compared for functional outcomes. Successful decannulation was achieved more in Group-I and II than in Group-III. Voice outcome was better in Group-II patients compared to other groups. Outcomes of cordoplasty was better than posterior cordotomy and external procedures, with acceptable airway and good quality of voice. Posterior cordotomy is preferred in patients without tracheostomy and in pediatric patients. In patients with tracheostomy or who accept temporary tracheostomy, a cordoplasty is preferred for favorable voice. External procedure is preferred for patients not fit for general anesthesia.
在已发表的最大规模研究组之一中,比较后索切开术、声带成形术和外部手术治疗双侧声带麻痹的功能结果。回顾性比较研究。对2001年至2013年接受后索切开术(第一组)、声带成形术(第二组)和外部手术(第三组)的54例双侧声带麻痹患者的功能结果进行比较。第一组和第二组成功拔管的患者比第三组更多。与其他组相比,第二组患者的语音结果更好。声带成形术的结果优于后索切开术和外部手术,气道可接受,语音质量良好。对于没有气管切开术的患者和儿科患者,后索切开术是首选。对于有气管切开术或接受临时气管切开术的患者,为了获得良好的语音效果,首选声带成形术。对于不适合全身麻醉的患者,首选外部手术。