Hobbs G S, Hamdi A, Hilden P D, Goldberg J D, Poon M L, Ledesma C, Devlin S M, Rondon G, Papadopoulos E B, Jakubowski A A, O'Reilly R J, Champlin R E, Giralt S, Perales M-A, Kebriaei P
1] Adult Bone Marrow Transplantation Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA [2] Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2015 Apr;50(4):493-8. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2014.302. Epub 2015 Jan 26.
We compared outcomes of adult patients receiving T-cell-depleted (TCD) hematopoietic SCT (HCT) without additional GVHD prophylaxis at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC, N=52), with those of patients receiving conventional grafts at MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC, N=115) for ALL in CR1 or CR2. Patients received myeloablative conditioning. Thirty-nine patients received anti-thymocyte globulin at MSKCC and 29 at MDACC. Cumulative incidence of grades 2-4 acute (P=0.001, 17.3% vs 42.6% at 100 days) and chronic GVHD (P=0.006, 13.5% vs 33.4% at 3 years) were significantly lower in the TCD group. The non-relapse mortality at day 100, 1 and 3 years was 15.4, 25.0 and 35.9% in the TCD group and 9.6, 23.6 and 28.6% in the unmodified group (P=0.368). There was no difference in relapse (P=0.107, 21.3% vs 35.5% at 3 years), OS (P=0.854, 42.6% vs 43.0% at 3 years) or RFS (P=0.653, 42.8% vs 35.9% at 3 years). In an adjusted model, age >50, cytogenetics and CR status were associated with inferior RFS (hazard ratio (HR)=2.16, P=0.003, HR=1.77, P=0.022, HR=2.47, P<0.001), whereas graft type was NS (HR=0.90, P=0.635). OS and RFS rates are similar in patients undergoing TCD or conventional HCT, but TCD effectively reduces the rate of GVHD.
我们比较了纪念斯隆凯特琳癌症中心(MSKCC,N = 52)接受无额外移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)预防措施的T细胞去除(TCD)造血干细胞移植(HCT)的成年患者与MD安德森癌症中心(MDACC,N = 115)接受常规移植物的处于完全缓解(CR)1期或CR2期的急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)患者的治疗结果。患者接受清髓性预处理。39例患者在MSKCC接受抗胸腺细胞球蛋白治疗,29例在MDACC接受该治疗。TCD组2 - 4级急性GVHD(P = 0.001,100天时为17.3% 对42.6%)和慢性GVHD(P = 0.006,3年时为13.5% 对33.4%)的累积发生率显著更低。TCD组100天、1年和3年时的非复发死亡率分别为15.4%、25.0%和35.9%,未改良组分别为9.6%、23.6%和28.6%(P = 0.368)。复发率(P = 0.107,3年时为21.3% 对35.5%)、总生存期(OS,P = 0.854,3年时为42.6% 对43.0%)或无复发生存期(RFS,P = 0.653,3年时为42.8% 对35.9%)无差异。在一个校正模型中,年龄>50岁、细胞遗传学和CR状态与较差的RFS相关(风险比(HR)= 2.16,P = 0.003,HR = 1.77,P = 0.022,HR = 2.47,P < 0.001),而移植物类型无显著差异(HR = 0.90,P = 0.635)。接受TCD或常规HCT的患者的OS和RFS率相似,但TCD可有效降低GVHD发生率。