Suppr超能文献

肾去神经支配:从何而来,去向何方?

Renal denervation: unde venis et quo vadis?

作者信息

Nähle C P, Düsing R, Schild H

机构信息

Department of Radiology, University of Bonn, Germany.

Hypertoniezentrum Bonn, Schwerpunktpraxis Kardiologie-Angiologie-Rehabilitation, Bonn, Germany.

出版信息

Rofo. 2015 Apr;187(4):237-47. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1385526. Epub 2015 Jan 28.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE AND METHODS

Renal denervation is a minimally invasive, catheter-based option for the treatment of refractory hypertension. Indications and contraindications for renal denervation have been defined in an interdisciplinary manner. The efficacy and safety of the procedure were evaluated.

RESULTS

Currently, indication for renal denervation is limited to patients with primary hypertension and a systolic blood pressure of ≥ 160 mm Hg (or ≥ 150 mm Hg in diabetes type 2) despite optimal medical therapy with ≥ 3 different antihypertensive drugs. In this specific patient population, an average blood pressure reduction of 32/14 mmHg was observed in non-randomized/-controlled trials after renal denervation. These results were not confirmed in the first randomized controlled trial with a non-significantly superior blood pressure reduction of 14.1 ± 23.9 mm Hg compared to controls (-11.74 ± 25.94 mm Hg, difference -2.39 mm Hg p = 0.26 for superiority with a margin of 5 mm Hg) who underwent a sham procedure.

CONCLUSION

The efficacy and long-term effects of renal denervation need to be re-evaluated in light of the HTN3 study results. To date, renal denervation should not be performed outside of clinical trials. Future trials should also assess if renal denervation can be performed with sufficient safety and efficacy in patients with hypertension-associated diseases. The use of renal denervation as an alternative therapy (e. g. in patients with drug intolerance) can currently not be advocated.

KEY POINTS

The indication for renal denervation should be assessed in an interdisciplinary fashion and according to current guidelines with a special focus on ruling out secondary causes for arterial hypertension. 5 - 10 % of patients with hypertension suffer from refractory hypertension, but only about 1 % of patients meet the criteria for a renal denervation. Renal denervation leads to a significant decrease in office blood pressure; however, the impact on 24-hour blood pressure measurements remains unclear. In the first randomized controlled trial on renal denervation with a control group undergoing a sham procedure, blood pressure reduction failed to reach the anticipated level of superiority over best medical treatment. Periprocedural complications are rare, but long-term safety can currently not be appraised due to the limited data available.

摘要

目的与方法

肾去神经支配术是一种用于治疗顽固性高血压的微创、基于导管的治疗方法。肾去神经支配术的适应证和禁忌证已通过多学科方式确定。对该手术的疗效和安全性进行了评估。

结果

目前,肾去神经支配术的适应证仅限于尽管使用了≥3种不同的抗高血压药物进行了优化药物治疗,但收缩压仍≥160mmHg(2型糖尿病患者为≥150mmHg)的原发性高血压患者。在这一特定患者群体中,肾去神经支配术后的非随机/非对照试验中观察到平均血压降低32/14mmHg。在第一项随机对照试验中,与接受假手术的对照组相比,血压降低14.1±23.9mmHg,无显著优势(对照组为-11.74±25.94mmHg,优势差值为-2.39mmHg,p=0.26,优势界值为5mmHg),这些结果未得到证实。

结论

鉴于HTN3研究结果,需要重新评估肾去神经支配术的疗效和长期效果。迄今为止,不应在临床试验之外进行肾去神经支配术。未来的试验还应评估肾去神经支配术在高血压相关疾病患者中能否以足够的安全性和疗效进行。目前不能提倡将肾去神经支配术作为替代疗法(例如用于药物不耐受的患者)。

要点

应通过多学科方式并根据当前指南评估肾去神经支配术的适应证,特别关注排除动脉高血压的继发原因。5%-10%的高血压患者患有顽固性高血压,但只有约1%的患者符合肾去神经支配术的标准。肾去神经支配术可导致诊室血压显著降低;然而,对24小时血压测量的影响仍不清楚。在第一项有对照组接受假手术的肾去神经支配术随机对照试验中,血压降低未能达到优于最佳药物治疗的预期水平。围手术期并发症很少见,但由于现有数据有限,目前无法评估长期安全性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验