Chen Yen-Chou, Scaglioni Mario F, Huang Eng-Yen, Kuo Yur-Ren
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Microsurgery. 2016 Jul;36(5):391-396. doi: 10.1002/micr.22384. Epub 2015 Jan 28.
The superior thyroid artery (STA) is the most commonly used recipient vessel in free tissue transfer for head and neck reconstruction. Size discrepancy between recipient and donor vessels might affect the patency rate. The objective of this study was to compare the outcomes of the "open-Y" technique in end-to-end anastomoses between the STA and donor arteries to those of conventional anastomoses to the STA.
A total of 337 patients with free tissue transfer for head and neck reconstruction with the STA as the recipient artery were recruited between September 2011 and August 2013. The "open-Y" technique of anastomosis was used in 72 cases, whereas the conventional technique was applied in 256 cases. The arterial anastomotic site-related complications and size discrepancy rates of both groups were evaluated and compared.
The flap success rate was 98.6% (71/72) in the "open-Y" group, which was similar to the conventional group [97.4% (245/252); P = 0.999]. Size discrepancy rate was higher in the "open-Y" group [48/72(66.7%)] compared to that in the conventional group [31/265(11.7%), P < 0.001]. There was no significant difference regarding arterial anastomotic site-related complications between the "open-Y" and conventional groups (1.4% vs.4.2%; P = 0.473). Others complications, including re-exploration, venous thrombosis, hematoma, fistula, infection, partial flap necrosis and total flap necrosis, had similar presentations.
The utility of the "open-Y" technique, applied to STA as a recipient vessel, appeared to be a reasonable option for head and neck reconstruction. This technique seems to be promising for cases with vessels size discrepancy. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microsurgery 36:391-396, 2016.
甲状腺上动脉(STA)是头颈部重建游离组织移植中最常用的受区血管。受区与供区血管的管径差异可能会影响通畅率。本研究的目的是比较STA与供体动脉端端吻合的“开放Y”技术与STA传统吻合技术的效果。
2011年9月至2013年8月间,共招募了337名头颈部重建采用STA作为受区动脉进行游离组织移植的患者。72例采用“开放Y”吻合技术,而256例采用传统技术。对两组的动脉吻合部位相关并发症和管径差异率进行评估和比较。
“开放Y”组皮瓣成功率为98.6%(71/72),与传统组相似[97.4%(245/252);P = 0.999]。“开放Y”组的管径差异率[48/72(66.7%)]高于传统组[31/265(11.7%),P < 0.001]。“开放Y”组与传统组在动脉吻合部位相关并发症方面无显著差异(1.4%对4.2%;P = 0.473)。其他并发症,包括再次手术探查、静脉血栓形成、血肿、瘘管、感染、部分皮瓣坏死和全皮瓣坏死,表现相似。
将“开放Y”技术应用于STA作为受区血管,对头颈部重建似乎是一个合理的选择。该技术对于血管管径有差异的病例似乎很有前景。© 2015威利期刊公司。显微外科学36:391 - 396,2016。