Suppr超能文献

急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死支架植入术后靶血管血运重建的预测因素及影响:来自HORIZONS-AMI研究的经验教训

Predictors and impact of target vessel revascularization after stent implantation for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: lessons from HORIZONS-AMI.

作者信息

Brener Sorin J, Ertelt Konstanze, Mehran Roxana, Genereux Philippe, Xu Ke, Witzenbichler Bernhard, Brodie Bruce R, Guagliumi Giulio, Stone Gregg W

机构信息

New York Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn, NY; Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY.

Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY.

出版信息

Am Heart J. 2015 Feb;169(2):242-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.11.005. Epub 2014 Nov 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Target vessel revascularization (TVR) may compromise the benefits of primary percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) We set out to identify the predictors and examine the impact of TVR after STEMI in patients receiving a coronary stent.

METHODS

In HORIZONS-AMI, 3,602 patients with STEMI were randomized to bivalirudin versus heparin and a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor. Stents were implanted in 3,202 patients (2,982 were randomized to bare-metal stents versus paclitaxel-eluting stents, and 220 received nonrandomized stents).

RESULTS

Target vessel revascularization occurred in 219 patients (6.9%) at 1 year and in 437 patients (14.4%) at 3 years. Target vessel revascularization was ischemia-driven in 418 cases (95.7%). Target vessel revascularization was due to restenosis in 219 patients (50.1%), definite stent thrombosis in 124 (28.4%), and disease progression in 94 (21.5%). Independent predictors of TVR were more extensive coronary artery disease, smaller vessel size, longer lesion length and the number of stents implanted, post-percutaneous coronary intervention diameter stenosis, symptom onset to balloon time, treatment with bare-metal stents rather than paclitaxel-eluting stents, and scheduled angiographic follow-up. Target vessel revascularization was an independent predictor of subsequent myocardial infarction (hazard ratio [HR] 5.25, P < .0001), ST (HR 5.98, P < .0001), and major bleeding (HR 5.25, P < .0001) but not mortality (HR 0.88, P = .61).

CONCLUSIONS

In HORIZONS-AMI, TVR within 3 years after stent implantation was performed in ~1 of every 7 patients and was associated with more extensive coronary disease, more complex procedures, and bare metal stents. Target vessel revascularization was often due to stent thrombosis and disease progression as well as restenosis and was strongly associated with adverse outcomes but not mortality.

摘要

背景

靶血管血运重建(TVR)可能会削弱ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的获益。我们旨在确定接受冠状动脉支架置入术的STEMI患者TVR的预测因素,并研究TVR的影响。

方法

在HORIZONS-AMI研究中,3602例STEMI患者被随机分为比伐芦定组与肝素加糖蛋白IIb/IIIa抑制剂组。3202例患者植入了支架(2982例被随机分为接受裸金属支架与紫杉醇洗脱支架,220例接受非随机分配的支架)。

结果

1年时219例患者(6.9%)发生靶血管血运重建,3年时437例患者(14.4%)发生靶血管血运重建。418例(95.7%)的靶血管血运重建是由缺血驱动的。219例患者(50.1%)的靶血管血运重建是由于再狭窄,124例(28.4%)是由于明确的支架血栓形成,94例(21.5%)是由于疾病进展。TVR的独立预测因素包括更广泛的冠状动脉疾病、更小的血管直径、更长的病变长度和植入支架的数量、经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后直径狭窄、症状发作至球囊扩张时间、接受裸金属支架而非紫杉醇洗脱支架治疗以及计划的血管造影随访。靶血管血运重建是随后发生心肌梗死(风险比[HR]5.25,P<.0001)、ST段抬高(HR 5.98,P<.0001)和大出血(HR 5.25,P<.0001)的独立预测因素,但不是死亡率的独立预测因素(HR 0.88,P = 0.61)。

结论

在HORIZONS-AMI研究中,支架植入后3年内约每7例患者中有1例进行了TVR,且与更广泛的冠状动脉疾病、更复杂的手术操作和裸金属支架相关。靶血管血运重建通常是由于支架血栓形成、疾病进展以及再狭窄,并且与不良结局密切相关,但与死亡率无关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验