Turrentine Florence E, Giballa Sarah B, Shah Puja M, Jones David R, Hedrick Traci L, Friel Charles M
Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Am Surg. 2015 Feb;81(2):193-7.
Intraoperative wound classification is a predictor of postoperative infection. Therefore, accurately assigning the correct classification to a surgical wound is of particular importance. Our institution participates in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP), a national outcomes database that collects wound classification for all qualifying operative procedures, and we noted discrepancies when comparing ACS NSQIP wound classification coding with perioperative coding in our electronic medical record. We tested the effectiveness of an intervention that included staff educational sessions, informational posters, and postoperative debriefings on improving the accuracy of documented intraoperative wound classification. The χ(2) test was used to compare proportions of wound classification miscodings before and after educational sessions and debriefings commenced. Baseline data revealed misclassification of wounds occurred 21 per cent (30 of 141) of the time in predominately colorectal procedures performed by two surgeons from April through August 2012. Errors decreased to 9 per cent (13 of 147) from August to December 2012, after our intervention of education sessions with operating room staff and the surgeons incorporating a statement confirming the wound classification at the end of the case debriefing. The χ(2) statistic was 8.7589. The P value was significant at 0.003. Ensuring concordance of classification between the surgeon and nurse during a postprocedure debriefing as well as education of perioperative nursing staff through posters and seminars significantly improved the accuracy of intraoperative wound classification coding.
术中伤口分类是术后感染的一个预测指标。因此,准确地为手术伤口指定正确的分类尤为重要。我们机构参与了美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划(ACS NSQIP),这是一个全国性的结果数据库,收集所有符合条件的手术操作的伤口分类信息,并且我们在将ACS NSQIP伤口分类编码与我们电子病历中的围手术期编码进行比较时发现了差异。我们测试了一种干预措施的有效性,该干预措施包括员工教育课程、信息海报以及术后汇报,以提高记录的术中伤口分类的准确性。χ(2)检验用于比较教育课程和汇报开始前后伤口分类错误编码的比例。基线数据显示,在2012年4月至8月由两位外科医生进行的主要结直肠手术中,伤口误分类的发生率为21%(141例中的30例)。在我们对手术室工作人员和外科医生进行教育课程干预,并在病例汇报结束时加入确认伤口分类的声明后,2012年8月至12月期间,错误率降至9%(147例中的13例)。χ(2)统计量为8.7589。P值在0.003时具有显著性。在术后汇报期间确保外科医生和护士之间分类的一致性,以及通过海报和研讨会对围手术期护理人员进行教育,显著提高了术中伤口分类编码的准确性。