Suppr超能文献

鼻中隔体部减容术治疗鼻塞患者的可行性

Feasibility of septal body volume reduction for patients with nasal obstruction.

作者信息

Yu Myeong Sang, Kim Jong-Yeup, Kim Bo-Hyung, Kang Sung-Ho, Lim Dae Jun

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Chungju, Republic of Korea.

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, College of Medicine, Konyang University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Laryngoscope. 2015 Jul;125(7):1523-8. doi: 10.1002/lary.25154. Epub 2015 Jan 30.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Septal body hypertrophy, like inferior turbinate hypertrophy, can result in changes to the nasal cross-sectional area and resistance to airflow. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of septal body volume reduction (SBVR) for the treatment of septal body hypertrophy in patients with nasal obstruction.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective randomized study.

METHODS

The study was conducted on two groups (51 patients) with symptoms and signs of nasal obstruction associated with septal body and inferior turbinate hypertrophy that were refractory to medical therapy. In the turbinoplasty only (ITR) group (n = 25), conventional turbinoplasty was only performed on the inferior turbinate. In the septal body reduction (SBR) group (n = 26), concurrent bilateral microdebrider-assisted SBVR was performed during the turbinate surgery.

RESULTS

The nasal symptoms, including nasal obstruction, rhinorrhea, itching, and sneezing, had significantly improved at 3 months after treatment in both groups (P < 0.001). Improvement of nasal obstruction in the SBR group was greater than that in the ITR group at 3 months (P < 0.05). Acoustic rhinometry demonstrated a significant increase in the cross-sectional area and nasal volume in both groups 3 months after surgery. The postoperative change in nasal volume was higher in the SBR group (P < 0.05). No adverse reactions such as bleeding, infection, adhesions, or olfactory changes were encountered in the SBR group.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined SBVR and turbinoplasty appears to be more effective than turbinoplasty alone for the treatment of nasal obstruction in patients with inferior turbinate and septal body hypertrophy.

摘要

目的

鼻中隔体肥大与下鼻甲肥大一样,可导致鼻腔横截面积及气流阻力发生改变。本研究旨在评估鼻中隔体减容术(SBVR)治疗鼻塞患者鼻中隔体肥大的疗效。

研究设计

前瞻性随机研究。

方法

对两组(共51例患者)因鼻中隔体和下鼻甲肥大导致鼻塞且药物治疗无效的患者进行研究。单纯鼻甲成形术(ITR)组(n = 25)仅对下鼻甲进行传统鼻甲成形术。鼻中隔体切除术(SBR)组(n = 26)在鼻甲手术期间同时进行双侧微型清创器辅助的SBVR。

结果

两组患者治疗后3个月时,鼻塞、流涕、瘙痒及打喷嚏等鼻部症状均有显著改善(P < 0.001)。SBR组在3个月时鼻塞改善程度大于ITR组(P < 0.05)。鼻声反射测量显示,两组患者术后3个月鼻腔横截面积和鼻腔容积均显著增加。SBR组术后鼻腔容积变化更大(P < 0.05)。SBR组未出现出血、感染、粘连或嗅觉改变等不良反应。

结论

对于下鼻甲和鼻中隔体肥大患者,联合SBVR和鼻甲成形术治疗鼻塞似乎比单纯鼻甲成形术更有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验