Murphy Julia, Ko Michelle, Kizer Kenneth W, Bindman Andrew B
University of California, San Francisco.
University of California, Davis.
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2015 Apr;40(2):403-19. doi: 10.1215/03616878-2882267. Epub 2015 Feb 2.
With the expansion of coverage as a result of federal health care reform, safety net providers are confronting a challenge to care for the underserved while also competing as a provider of choice for the newly insured. Safety net institutions may be able to achieve these goals by pursuing greater delivery system integration. We interviewed safety net hospital and community health center (CHCs) leaders in five US cities to determine what strategies these organizations are employing to promote care integration in the safety net. Although there is some experimentation with payment reform and health information exchange, safety net providers identify significant policy and structural barriers to integrating service delivery. The enhanced Medicaid payments for CHCs and the federal requirement that CHCs retain independent boards discourage these organizations from integrating with other safety net providers. Current policies are not mobilizing safety net providers to pursue integration as a way to deliver more efficient and effective care. Medicaid and other policies at the federal and state level could be revised to overcome known fragmentation in the health care safety net. This includes addressing the conflicts in financing and governance arrangements that are encouraging providers to resist integration to preserve their independence.
随着联邦医疗改革带来的覆盖范围扩大,安全网医疗机构在为服务不足人群提供护理的同时,还要作为新参保者的首选医疗机构进行竞争,面临着挑战。安全网机构或许可以通过追求更高程度的医疗服务体系整合来实现这些目标。我们采访了美国五个城市的安全网医院和社区健康中心(CHC)的负责人,以确定这些组织采用了哪些策略来促进安全网内的医疗整合。尽管在支付改革和健康信息交换方面有一些尝试,但安全网医疗机构指出了整合服务提供存在的重大政策和结构障碍。社区健康中心增加的医疗补助支付以及联邦要求社区健康中心保留独立董事会的规定,阻碍了这些组织与其他安全网医疗机构进行整合。当前政策未能促使安全网医疗机构将整合作为提供更高效护理的一种方式。联邦和州层面的医疗补助及其他政策可以进行修订,以克服医疗安全网中已知的碎片化问题。这包括解决融资和治理安排中的冲突,这些冲突促使医疗机构抵制整合以维护其独立性。