Qin Charles, Antony Anuja K, Aggarwal Apas, Jordan Sumanas, Gutowski Karol A, Kim John Y S
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Division of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Cosmetic, Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Oct;22(11):3724-9. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4407-5. Epub 2015 Feb 5.
With the rising cost of healthcare delivery and bundled payments for episodes of care, there has been impetus to minimize hospitalization and increase utilization of outpatient surgery mechanisms. Given the increase in outpatient mastectomy and immediate tissue expander (TE)-based reconstruction and the paucity of data on its comparative safety to inpatient procedures, we sought to understand the risk for early postoperative complications in an outpatient model compared with more traditional inpatient status using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database.
NSQIP data files from 2005 to 2012 were queried to identify patients undergoing immediate TE-based breast reconstruction after mastectomy. Patients were stratified by whether they received outpatient or inpatient care and then propensity score matched based on preoperative baseline characteristics to produce matched cohorts. Multivariate regression analysis was used to determine whether outpatient versus inpatient status conferred differing risk for 30-days complications.
Of the 2014 patients who met criteria, 1:1 propensity matching yielded 634 patients in each of the matched cohorts. Overall complications (5.2 vs. 5.4 %), overall surgical complications (4.3 vs. 3.9 %), overall medical complications (1.3 vs. 2.1 %), and return to the operating room (6.6 vs. 7.3 %) were similar between outpatient and inpatients cohorts (p > .2), respectively. There was a small, but significant increased risk of organ/space SSI in outpatients (1.9 vs. 0.5 %, p = .02) and trend for increased risk for pulmonary embolus (PE) and urinary tract infection (UTI) in inpatients (0.3 vs. 0 %, p = .16; 0.3 vs. 0 %, p = .16).
Our studies suggest that outpatient TE confers similar safety profiles to inpatient TE with regards to 30-day postoperative overall complications, medical and surgical morbidity, and return to the operating room. A slightly increased risk for surgical site infection must be balanced against potential risk for known inpatient-related complications such as UTI and PE.
随着医疗服务成本的上升以及针对护理阶段的捆绑式支付,人们有动力尽量减少住院时间并提高门诊手术机制的利用率。鉴于门诊乳房切除术和基于即时组织扩张器(TE)的重建手术有所增加,且缺乏其与住院手术相比安全性的数据,我们试图利用国家外科质量改进计划数据库来了解门诊模式下与更传统的住院模式相比术后早期并发症的风险。
查询2005年至2012年的国家外科质量改进计划数据文件,以识别乳房切除术后接受基于即时TE的乳房重建的患者。根据患者接受门诊还是住院护理进行分层,然后根据术前基线特征进行倾向评分匹配,以产生匹配队列。采用多变量回归分析来确定门诊与住院状态是否会导致30天并发症风险的差异。
在符合标准的2014例患者中,1:1倾向匹配在每个匹配队列中产生了634例患者。门诊和住院队列之间的总体并发症(5.2%对5.4%)、总体手术并发症(4.3%对3.9%)、总体医疗并发症(1.3%对2.1%)以及返回手术室的比例(6.6%对7.3%)相似(p>.2)。门诊患者发生器官/腔隙手术部位感染的风险略有增加但具有统计学意义(1.9%对0.5%,p=.02),住院患者发生肺栓塞(PE)和尿路感染(UTI)的风险有增加趋势(0.3%对0%,p=.16;0.3%对0%,p=.16)。
我们的研究表明,就术后30天的总体并发症、医疗和手术发病率以及返回手术室而言,门诊TE与住院TE具有相似的安全性。手术部位感染风险略有增加必须与已知的住院相关并发症(如UTI和PE)的潜在风险相权衡。