Parashar Abhishek, Aileni Kaladhar Reddy, Rachala Madhukar Reddy, Shashidhar Nagam Reddy, Mallikarjun Vankre, Parik Nupur
Senior Lecturer, Department of Orthodontics, Jodhpur Dental College , Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India .
Associate Professor, Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry AL-JOUF UNIVERSITY , Sakaka Al-Jouf ProvinceKingdom of Saudi Arabia .
J Clin Diagn Res. 2014 Dec;8(12):ZC77-80. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/10099.5353. Epub 2014 Dec 5.
This FEM study was conducted to quantify the amount of torque loss in maxillary anterior teeth by applying force vectors from different levels to the anterior retraction hook at various heights and comparing with that of molar anchorage system.
Five 3D FEM models were constructed with force vectors at different levels: HOT-High Orthodontic Traction (13.5mm from archwire) to ARH1- Anterior Retraction Hook (5mm), HOT to ARH2 (8mm), LOT- Low Orthodontic Traction (8 mm) to ARH1, LOT to ARH2 and from conventional molar hook to ARH1. Mini-implants were placed buccally between the roots of second premolar and first molar. Torque loss was calculated by measuring the displacement of the teeth at crown tip and root apex in two planes i.e. sagittal and vertical using Y and Z axis respectively in all the five models. The results were statistically analyzed by using Kruskal Wallis ANOVA and Mann-Whitney U-test.
HOT to ARH1 showed that the anterior teeth moved bodily (p =0.5127), followed by molar hook - ARH1(p=0.0495*) which showed mild uncontrolled tipping. Whereas the HOT- ARH2, LOT - ARH1,and LOT - ARH2 models exhibited uncontrolled tipping with maximum torque loss in LOT - ARH1 (p=0.0001*).
It can be concluded that bodily movement with very minimal torque loss was observed in HOT-ARH1 model whereas the maximum torque loss was recorded in LOT-ARH2 model. Conventional molar anchorage group showed uncontrolled tipping with some amount of extrusion and anchor loss of posteriors.
本有限元研究旨在通过在不同高度向牵引钩施加来自不同水平的力向量,并与磨牙支抗系统进行比较,来量化上颌前牙的转矩损失量。
构建了五个三维有限元模型,力向量处于不同水平:高正畸牵引(HOT,距弓丝13.5mm)至前牵引钩1(ARH1,5mm)、HOT至ARH2(8mm)、低正畸牵引(LOT,8mm)至ARH1、LOT至ARH2以及从传统磨牙钩至ARH1。微型种植体置于第二前磨牙和第一磨牙牙根之间的颊侧。通过测量所有五个模型中牙齿在矢状面和垂直面(分别使用Y轴和Z轴)的冠尖和根尖位移来计算转矩损失。结果采用Kruskal Wallis方差分析和Mann-Whitney U检验进行统计学分析。
HOT至ARH1显示前牙整体移动(p = 0.5127),其次是磨牙钩 - ARH1(p = 0.0495*),显示出轻度的不受控制的倾斜。而HOT - ARH2、LOT - ARH1和LOT - ARH2模型表现出不受控制的倾斜,LOT - ARH1中转矩损失最大(p = 0.0001*)。
可以得出结论,HOT - ARH1模型中观察到整体移动且转矩损失非常小,而LOT - ARH2模型中记录到最大转矩损失。传统磨牙支抗组显示出不受控制的倾斜,伴有一些后牙的伸长和支抗丧失。