Suppr超能文献

急性腹痛患者诊断路径指南。

Guideline for the diagnostic pathway in patients with acute abdominal pain.

作者信息

Gans Sarah L, Pols Margreet A, Stoker Jaap, Boermeester Marja A

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Dig Surg. 2015;32(1):23-31. doi: 10.1159/000371583. Epub 2015 Jan 28.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Diagnostic practice for acute abdominal pain at the Emergency Department varies widely and is mostly based on doctor's preferences. We aimed at developing an evidence-based guideline for the diagnostic pathway of patients with abdominal pain of non-traumatic origin.

METHODS

All available international literature on patients with acute abdominal pain was identified and graded according to their methodological quality by members of the multidisciplinary steering group. A guideline was synthetized, providing evidence-based recommendations together with considerations based on expertise of group members, patient preferences, costs, availability of facilities, and organizational aspects.

DEFINITION

Uniform terminology is needed in patients with acute abdominal pain to avoid difficulty in interpretation and ease comparison of findings between studies. We propose the use of the following definition for acute abdominal pain: pain of nontraumatic origin with a maximum duration of 5 days. Clinical diagnosis: Clinical evaluation is advised to differentiate between urgent and nonurgent causes. The diagnostic accuracy of clinical assessment is insufficient to identify the correct diagnosis but can discriminate between urgent and nonurgent causes. Patients suspected of nonurgent diagnoses can safely be reevaluated the next day. Based on current literature, no conclusions can be drawn on the differences in accuracy between residents and specialists. No conclusions can be drawn on the influence of a gynecological consultation. In patients suspected of an urgent condition, additional imaging is justified. CRP and WBC count alone are insufficient to discriminate urgent from nonurgent diagnoses. Diagnostic imaging: There is no place for conventional radiography in the work-up of patients with acute abdominal pain due to the lack of added value on top of clinical assessment. Computed tomography leads to the highest sensitivity and specificity in patients with acute abdominal pain. Positive predictive value of ultrasound is comparable with CT and therefore preferred as the first imaging modality due to the downsides of computed tomography; negative or inconclusive ultrasound is followed by CT. Based on current literature, no conclusions can be drawn on the added value of a diagnostic laparoscopy in the work-up of patients with acute abdominal pain. Antibiotic treatment should be started within the first hour after recognition of sepsis. Administration of opioids (analgesics) decreases the intensity of the pain and does not affect the accuracy of physical examination.

摘要

引言

急诊科对急性腹痛的诊断实践差异很大,且大多基于医生的偏好。我们旨在制定一项基于证据的非创伤性腹痛患者诊断路径指南。

方法

多学科指导小组的成员确定了所有关于急性腹痛患者的现有国际文献,并根据其方法学质量进行分级。综合制定了一项指南,提供基于证据的建议以及基于小组成员专业知识、患者偏好、成本、设施可用性和组织方面的考虑因素。

定义

急性腹痛患者需要统一的术语,以避免解释困难并便于研究结果之间的比较。我们建议对急性腹痛使用以下定义:非创伤性起源的疼痛,最长持续时间为5天。临床诊断:建议进行临床评估以区分紧急和非紧急病因。临床评估的诊断准确性不足以确定正确诊断,但可以区分紧急和非紧急病因。怀疑为非紧急诊断的患者可在第二天安全地进行重新评估。根据现有文献,无法得出住院医师和专科医生在准确性方面的差异结论。无法得出妇科会诊影响的结论。对于怀疑有紧急情况的患者,进行额外的影像学检查是合理的。仅C反应蛋白(CRP)和白细胞计数不足以区分紧急和非紧急诊断。诊断性影像学检查:由于在临床评估之外缺乏附加价值,传统放射摄影在急性腹痛患者的检查中没有作用。计算机断层扫描(CT)在急性腹痛患者中具有最高的敏感性和特异性。超声的阳性预测值与CT相当,因此由于CT的缺点,首选作为第一种影像学检查方式;超声检查结果为阴性或不确定时,随后进行CT检查。根据现有文献,无法得出诊断性腹腔镜检查在急性腹痛患者检查中的附加价值结论。在识别败血症后的第一小时内就应开始抗生素治疗。使用阿片类药物(镇痛药)可减轻疼痛强度,且不影响体格检查的准确性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验