Osmundson Evan C, Wu Yufan, Luxton Gary, Bazan Jose G, Koong Albert C, Chang Daniel T
Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 Apr 1;91(5):986-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.11.028. Epub 2015 Feb 3.
To identify dosimetric predictors of hepatobiliary (HB) toxicity associated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for liver tumors.
We retrospectively reviewed 96 patients treated with SBRT for primary (53%) or metastatic (47%) liver tumors between March 2006 and November 2013. The central HB tract (cHBT) was defined by a 15-mm expansion of the portal vein from the splenic confluence to the first bifurcation of left and right portal veins. Patients were censored for toxicity upon local progression or additional liver-directed therapy. HB toxicities were graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. To compare different SBRT fractionations, doses were converted to biologically effective doses (BED) by using the standard linear quadratic model α/β = 10 (BED10).
Median follow-up was 12.7 months after SBRT. Median BED10 was 85.5 Gy (range: 37.5-151.2). The median number of fractions was 5 (range: 1-5), with 51 patients (53.1%) receiving 5 fractions and 29 patients (30.2%) receiving 3 fractions. In total, there were 23 (24.0%) grade 2+ and 18 (18.8%) grade 3+ HB toxicities. Nondosimetric factors predictive of grade 3+ HB toxicity included cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) histology (P<.0001), primary liver tumor (P=.0087), and biliary stent (P<.0001). Dosimetric parameters most predictive of grade 3+ HB toxicity were volume receiving above BED10 of 72 Gy (VBED1072) ≥ 21 cm(3) (relative risk [RR]: 11.6, P<.0001), VBED1066 ≥ 24 cm(3) (RR: 10.5, P<.0001), and mean BED10 (DmeanBED10) cHBT ≥14 Gy (RR: 9.2, P<.0001), with VBED1072 and VBED1066 corresponding to V40 and V37.7 for 5 fractions and V33.8 and V32.0 for 3 fractions, respectively. VBED1072 ≥ 21 cm(3), VBED1066 ≥ 24 cm(3), and DmeanBED10 cHBT ≥14 Gy were consistently predictive of grade 3+ toxicity on multivariate analysis.
VBED1072, VBED1066, and DmeanBED10 to cHBT are associated with HB toxicity. We suggest VBED1072 < 21 cm(3) (5-fraction: V40 < 21 cm(3); 3-fraction: V33.8 < 21 cm(3)), VBED1066 < 24 cm(3) (5-fraction: V37.7 < 24 cm(3); 3-fraction: V32 < 24 cm(3)) as potential dose constraints for the cHBT when clinically indicated.
确定与立体定向体部放射治疗(SBRT)治疗肝脏肿瘤相关的肝胆(HB)毒性的剂量学预测因素。
我们回顾性分析了2006年3月至2013年11月期间接受SBRT治疗原发性(53%)或转移性(47%)肝脏肿瘤的96例患者。中央HB路径(cHBT)定义为从脾静脉汇合处到左右门静脉第一分支处门静脉15毫米的扩展范围。患者在局部进展或接受额外的肝脏定向治疗时进行毒性审查。HB毒性根据不良事件通用术语标准第4.0版进行分级。为了比较不同的SBRT分割方案,使用标准线性二次模型α/β = 10将剂量转换为生物等效剂量(BED)(BED10)。
SBRT后中位随访时间为12.7个月。中位BED10为85.5 Gy(范围:37.5 - 151.2)。中位分割次数为5次(范围:1 - 5次),51例患者(53.1%)接受5次分割,29例患者(30.2%)接受3次分割。总共有23例(24.0%)2级及以上和18例(18.8%)3级及以上HB毒性。预测3级及以上HB毒性的非剂量学因素包括胆管癌(CCA)组织学(P <.0001)、原发性肝脏肿瘤(P =.0087)和胆管支架(P <.0001)。最能预测3级及以上HB毒性的剂量学参数为接受BED10高于72 Gy的体积(VBED1072)≥21 cm³(相对风险[RR]:11.6,P <.0001)、VBED1066≥24 cm³(RR:10.5,P <.0001)以及cHBT的平均BED10(DmeanBED10)≥14 Gy(RR:9.2,P <.0001),其中VBED1072和VBED1066分别对应5次分割时V40和V37.7以及3次分割时V33.8和V32.0。在多变量分析中,VBED1072≥21 cm³、VBED1066≥24 cm³以及DmeanBED10 cHBT≥14 Gy始终可预测3级及以上毒性。
VBED1072、VBED1066以及cHBT的DmeanBED10与HB毒性相关。我们建议当临床有指征时,对于cHBT,VBED1072 < 21 cm³(5次分割:V40 < 21 cm³;3次分割:V33.8 < 21 cm³)、VBED1066 < 24 cm³(5次分割:V