Kendler Kenneth S, Ohlsson Henrik, Maes Hermine H, Sundquist Kristina, Lichtenstein Paul, Sundquist Jan
Virginia Institute for Psychiatric and Behavioral Genetics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA; Department of Human and Molecular Genetics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Center for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015 Apr 1;149:49-54. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.01.016. Epub 2015 Jan 28.
Prior studies, utilizing interview-based assessments, suggest that most of the genetic risk factors for drug abuse (DA) are non-specific with a minority acting specifically on risk for abuse of particular psychoactive substance classes. We seek to replicate these findings using objective national registry data.
We examined abuse of cannabis, stimulants (including cocaine) and sedatives ascertained from national Swedish registers in male-male monozygotic (1720 pairs) and dizygotic twins (1219 pairs) combined with near-age full siblings (76,457 pairs) to provide sufficient power. Modeling was performed using Mx.
A common pathway model fitted better than an independent pathway model. The latent liability to DA was highly heritable but also influenced by shared environment. Cannabis, stimulant and sedative abuse all loaded strongly on the common factor. Estimates for the total heritability for the three forms of substance abuse ranged from 64 to 70%. Between 75 and 90% of that genetic risk was non-specific, coming from the common factor with the remainder deriving from substance specific genetic risk factors. By contrast, all of the shared environmental effects, which accounted for 18-20% of the variance in liability, were non-specific.
In accord with prior studies based on personal interviews, the large preponderance of genetic risk factors for abuse of specific classes of psychoactive substance are non-specific. These results suggest that genetic variation in the primary sites of action of the psychoactive drugs, which differ widely across most drug classes, play a minor role in human individual differences in risk for DA.
先前利用基于访谈的评估进行的研究表明,药物滥用(DA)的大多数遗传风险因素是非特异性的,少数因素对特定精神活性物质类别的滥用风险有特异性作用。我们试图使用客观的国家登记数据来复制这些发现。
我们研究了从瑞典国家登记处确定的大麻、兴奋剂(包括可卡因)和镇静剂的滥用情况,这些数据来自男性同性单卵双胞胎(1720对)和异卵双胞胎(1219对),并结合了年龄相近的全同胞(76457对),以提供足够的效力。使用Mx进行建模。
一个共同途径模型比独立途径模型拟合得更好。DA的潜在易感性具有高度遗传性,但也受到共同环境的影响。大麻、兴奋剂和镇静剂的滥用都在共同因素上有很强的负荷。三种物质滥用形式的总遗传率估计范围为64%至70%。该遗传风险的75%至90%是非特异性的,来自共同因素,其余部分来自物质特异性遗传风险因素。相比之下,所有共同环境效应占易感性变异的18%至20%,都是非特异性的。
与先前基于个人访谈的研究一致,特定类别的精神活性物质滥用的遗传风险因素绝大多数是非特异性 的。这些结果表明,精神活性药物主要作用位点的遗传变异在人类DA风险的个体差异中起次要作用,而这些主要作用位点在大多数药物类别中差异很大。