International Diabetes Center at Park Nicollet Clinic, Minneapolis, MN.
International Diabetes Center at Park Nicollet Clinic, Minneapolis, MN.
Mayo Clin Proc. 2015 Mar;90(3):329-38. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2014.12.014. Epub 2015 Feb 7.
To determine whether insulin delivered via a 4-mm × 32-gauge pen needle (PN) provides equivalent glycemic control as 8-mm × 31-gauge and 12.7-mm × 29-gauge PNs in obese (body mass index ≥30) patients with diabetes.
This prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label, 2-period, crossover, equivalence, home-based study was conducted from October 26, 2010, through May 31, 2012. After a 3-week wash-in period, eligible patients aged 18 to 80 years with a hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level of 5.5% to 9.5% (37-80 mmol/mol) were randomized to compare either 4- vs 8-mm PNs or 4- vs 12.7-mm PNs, using each of the 2 assigned PNs for 12 weeks in random order. The primary outcome was change in HbA1c level, with equivalence limits of ±0.4%.
The 274 patients randomized (mean ± SD age, 56.7±11.0 years) had a mean ± SD body mass index of 37.0±6.1 (range, 29.1-59.9) and took up to 350 U of insulin daily; 226 patients were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. Mean (95% CI) changes in HbA1c levels with the 4-mm PN were -0.08% (-0.21 to 0.06) and -0.10% (-0.19 to 0.00) vs the 8- and 12.7-mm PNs, respectively, within equivalence margins. The 4-mm PN was less painful than the larger PNs (P<.05), with similar leakage rates reported (4.1%-4.3%). Patients preferred the 4-mm PN over the 12.7-mm PN (P<.05) but not significantly vs the 8-mm PN. There were no differences between PNs in insulin doses and hypoglycemic or hyperglycemic adverse event rates.
The 4-mm × 32-gauge PN provides equivalent glycemic control as 8- and 12.7-mm PNs in obese patients with diabetes, with less pain and no increase in leakage. Shorter PNs should be considered in all insulin-requiring patients with diabetes, including those who are obese.
clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01231984.
在患有糖尿病的肥胖(体重指数≥30)患者中,比较 4mm×32 号笔用针头(PN)与 8mm×31 号和 12.7mm×29 号 PN 给药时,胰岛素是否具有等效的血糖控制效果。
这是一项前瞻性、多中心、随机、开放标签、2 期、交叉、等效、基于家庭的研究,于 2010 年 10 月 26 日至 2012 年 5 月 31 日进行。经过 3 周的洗脱期,年龄在 18 岁至 80 岁之间、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平为 5.5%至 9.5%(37-80mmol/mol)的合格患者随机分为两组,分别使用两种分配的 PN 中的每一种进行 12 周的治疗,顺序随机。主要结局为 HbA1c 水平的变化,等效性界限为±0.4%。
274 名随机患者(平均年龄±标准差为 56.7±11.0 岁)的平均体重指数为 37.0±6.1(范围为 29.1-59.9),每日最多使用 350U 胰岛素;226 名患者纳入改良意向治疗分析。4mm PN 组 HbA1c 水平的平均(95%CI)变化为-0.08%(-0.21 至 0.06)和-0.10%(-0.19 至 0.00),与 8mm 和 12.7mm PN 相比,均在等效范围内。与较大的 PN 相比,4mm PN 的疼痛程度较轻(P<.05),且报告的漏液率相似(4.1%-4.3%)。患者更喜欢使用 4mm PN 而不是 12.7mm PN(P<.05),但与 8mm PN 相比,差异无统计学意义。不同 PN 之间的胰岛素剂量、低血糖和高血糖不良事件发生率无差异。
在患有糖尿病的肥胖患者中,4mm×32 号笔用针头与 8mm 和 12.7mm PN 相比,具有等效的血糖控制效果,且疼痛程度较轻,漏液率无增加。所有需要胰岛素治疗的糖尿病患者,包括肥胖患者,都应考虑使用较短的 PN。
clinicaltrials.gov 标识符:NCT01231984。