Suppr超能文献

经 4mm 笔式针头给予肥胖糖尿病患者胰岛素治疗的安全性和疗效。

Safety and efficacy of insulin therapy delivered via a 4mm pen needle in obese patients with diabetes.

机构信息

International Diabetes Center at Park Nicollet Clinic, Minneapolis, MN.

International Diabetes Center at Park Nicollet Clinic, Minneapolis, MN.

出版信息

Mayo Clin Proc. 2015 Mar;90(3):329-38. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2014.12.014. Epub 2015 Feb 7.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether insulin delivered via a 4-mm × 32-gauge pen needle (PN) provides equivalent glycemic control as 8-mm × 31-gauge and 12.7-mm × 29-gauge PNs in obese (body mass index ≥30) patients with diabetes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label, 2-period, crossover, equivalence, home-based study was conducted from October 26, 2010, through May 31, 2012. After a 3-week wash-in period, eligible patients aged 18 to 80 years with a hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level of 5.5% to 9.5% (37-80 mmol/mol) were randomized to compare either 4- vs 8-mm PNs or 4- vs 12.7-mm PNs, using each of the 2 assigned PNs for 12 weeks in random order. The primary outcome was change in HbA1c level, with equivalence limits of ±0.4%.

RESULTS

The 274 patients randomized (mean ± SD age, 56.7±11.0 years) had a mean ± SD body mass index of 37.0±6.1 (range, 29.1-59.9) and took up to 350 U of insulin daily; 226 patients were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. Mean (95% CI) changes in HbA1c levels with the 4-mm PN were -0.08% (-0.21 to 0.06) and -0.10% (-0.19 to 0.00) vs the 8- and 12.7-mm PNs, respectively, within equivalence margins. The 4-mm PN was less painful than the larger PNs (P<.05), with similar leakage rates reported (4.1%-4.3%). Patients preferred the 4-mm PN over the 12.7-mm PN (P<.05) but not significantly vs the 8-mm PN. There were no differences between PNs in insulin doses and hypoglycemic or hyperglycemic adverse event rates.

CONCLUSION

The 4-mm × 32-gauge PN provides equivalent glycemic control as 8- and 12.7-mm PNs in obese patients with diabetes, with less pain and no increase in leakage. Shorter PNs should be considered in all insulin-requiring patients with diabetes, including those who are obese.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01231984.

摘要

目的

在患有糖尿病的肥胖(体重指数≥30)患者中,比较 4mm×32 号笔用针头(PN)与 8mm×31 号和 12.7mm×29 号 PN 给药时,胰岛素是否具有等效的血糖控制效果。

患者和方法

这是一项前瞻性、多中心、随机、开放标签、2 期、交叉、等效、基于家庭的研究,于 2010 年 10 月 26 日至 2012 年 5 月 31 日进行。经过 3 周的洗脱期,年龄在 18 岁至 80 岁之间、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平为 5.5%至 9.5%(37-80mmol/mol)的合格患者随机分为两组,分别使用两种分配的 PN 中的每一种进行 12 周的治疗,顺序随机。主要结局为 HbA1c 水平的变化,等效性界限为±0.4%。

结果

274 名随机患者(平均年龄±标准差为 56.7±11.0 岁)的平均体重指数为 37.0±6.1(范围为 29.1-59.9),每日最多使用 350U 胰岛素;226 名患者纳入改良意向治疗分析。4mm PN 组 HbA1c 水平的平均(95%CI)变化为-0.08%(-0.21 至 0.06)和-0.10%(-0.19 至 0.00),与 8mm 和 12.7mm PN 相比,均在等效范围内。与较大的 PN 相比,4mm PN 的疼痛程度较轻(P<.05),且报告的漏液率相似(4.1%-4.3%)。患者更喜欢使用 4mm PN 而不是 12.7mm PN(P<.05),但与 8mm PN 相比,差异无统计学意义。不同 PN 之间的胰岛素剂量、低血糖和高血糖不良事件发生率无差异。

结论

在患有糖尿病的肥胖患者中,4mm×32 号笔用针头与 8mm 和 12.7mm PN 相比,具有等效的血糖控制效果,且疼痛程度较轻,漏液率无增加。所有需要胰岛素治疗的糖尿病患者,包括肥胖患者,都应考虑使用较短的 PN。

试验注册

clinicaltrials.gov 标识符:NCT01231984。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验