Morita T, Yamada T, Watanabe T, Nagahori E
1] Department of Physical Therapy, Kanagawa Rehabilitation Hospital, Atsugi, Japan [2] Department of Physical Therapy, Graduate School of Human Health Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Arakawa, Japan.
Department of Physical Therapy, Graduate School of Human Health Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Arakawa, Japan.
Spinal Cord. 2015 Jun;53(6):476-81. doi: 10.1038/sc.2015.18. Epub 2015 Feb 10.
Case-control study.
To identify daily living-related risk factors for pressure ulcer (PU) occurrence in community-living patients with spinal cord injury (SCI). To determine whether seat pressure influences PU occurrence, and how often patients with SCI perform pressure relief activities while living in the community.
Kanagawa Rehabilitation Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan.
Thirty-one patients admitted to this hospital for PU treatment were included in the case (PU) group. Thirty outpatients who did not have PUs at the time of the study, and had lived without PUs for at least a year, were included in the control (No PU) group. Patients were interviewed about lifestyle-related PU risk factors and a pressure-mapping system was used to measure interface pressure (IP) on their wheelchair seat. The No PU group patients recorded their daily activities and pressure relief maneuvers for 1 week.
Eight lifestyle factors and one risk assessment scale significantly differed between groups. Three factors showed significant odds ratios by logistic regression. IP did not significantly differ between groups. The self-counted number of pressure relief maneuvers (median (25th-75th percentile)) performed per hour in the No PU group was 2.5 (0.7-4.3) and including transfer and urination was 3.5 (2.0-5.3).
We identified potential PU risk factors related to lifestyle. The scores of one risk assessment scale were also associated with PU risk. Our results did not suggest an IP damage threshold. Patients in the No PU group performed pressure relief maneuvers, including related activities, approximately once every 17 min.
病例对照研究。
确定社区生活的脊髓损伤(SCI)患者发生压疮(PU)的日常生活相关危险因素。确定座位压力是否影响压疮的发生,以及脊髓损伤患者在社区生活时进行减压活动的频率。
日本神奈川县神奈川康复医院。
病例(压疮)组纳入31例因压疮治疗入院的患者。对照组(无压疮组)纳入30例在研究时没有压疮且至少一年没有发生压疮的门诊患者。就与生活方式相关的压疮危险因素对患者进行访谈,并使用压力映射系统测量其轮椅座位上的界面压力(IP)。无压疮组患者记录其1周的日常活动和减压动作。
两组之间有8个生活方式因素和1个风险评估量表存在显著差异。通过逻辑回归分析,3个因素显示出显著的优势比。两组之间的界面压力没有显著差异。无压疮组每小时进行的自我计数减压动作(中位数(第25-75百分位数))为2.5(0.7-4.3)次,包括转移和排尿时为3.5(2.0-5.3)次。
我们确定了与生活方式相关的潜在压疮危险因素。一个风险评估量表的得分也与压疮风险相关。我们的结果未表明存在界面压力损伤阈值。无压疮组患者大约每17分钟进行一次减压动作,包括相关活动。