Galarneau Charlene
Women's and Gender Studies Department, Wellesley College, 106 Central Street, Wellesley, MA, 02481, USA,
J Bioeth Inq. 2015 Jun;12(2):269-82. doi: 10.1007/s11673-015-9610-3. Epub 2015 Feb 12.
The U.S. 2010 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) exempts members of health care sharing ministries (HCSMs) from the individual mandate to have minimum essential insurance coverage. Little is generally known about these religious organizations and even less critical attention has been brought to bear on them and their ACA exemption. Both deserve close scrutiny due to the exemption's less than clear legislative justification, their potential influence on the ACA's policy and ethical success, and their salience to current religious liberty debates surrounding the expansion of religious exemptions from ACA responsibilities for both individuals and corporations. Analyzing documents of the United States' three largest health care sharing ministries and related material, I examine these organizations and their ACA exemption with particular consideration of their ethical dimensions. Here a thick description of the nature and workings of health care sharing ministries precedes a similar account of the ACA exemption. From these empirical analyses, five ethical and policy concerns emerge: (1) the charity versus insurance status of these ministries; (2) the conflation of two ACA religious exemptions; (3) the tension between the values of religious liberty and of justice; (4) the potential undermining of ACA policy goals; and (5) the questionable compliance of health care sharing ministries with ACA exemption requirements. An accurate and informed understanding of HCSMs is required for policymakers and others to justify the ACA exemption of health care sharing ministry members. A sufficient justification would address at least the five ethical and policy concerns raised here.
美国2010年《患者保护与平价医疗法案》(ACA)豁免了医疗保健共享部(HCSMs)成员购买最低限度基本保险的个人强制要求。人们对这些宗教组织普遍了解甚少,对它们及其ACA豁免的批判性关注更是微乎其微。鉴于该豁免的立法理由不够明确、它们对ACA政策和道德成功的潜在影响,以及它们在当前围绕个人和企业从ACA责任中获得宗教豁免权扩大的宗教自由辩论中的突出地位,这两者都值得密切审视。通过分析美国最大的三个医疗保健共享部的文件及相关资料,我对这些组织及其ACA豁免进行了研究,并特别考虑了它们的道德层面。在此,对医疗保健共享部的性质和运作进行详尽描述之后,是对ACA豁免的类似阐述。从这些实证分析中,出现了五个伦理和政策问题:(1)这些部门的慈善与保险地位;(2)ACA两项宗教豁免的混淆;(3)宗教自由价值观与正义价值观之间的紧张关系;(4)对ACA政策目标的潜在破坏;(5)医疗保健共享部对ACA豁免要求的合规性存疑。政策制定者和其他人员需要对HCSMs有准确且深入的理解,才能为ACA豁免医疗保健共享部成员找到正当理由。充分的理由至少应解决此处提出的五个伦理和政策问题。