Suppr超能文献

坐骨股骨撞击综合征:一项荟萃分析。

Ischiofemoral impingement syndrome: a meta-analysis.

作者信息

Singer Adam D, Subhawong Ty K, Jose Jean, Tresley Jonathan, Clifford Paul D

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Section of Musculoskeletal Imaging, Jackson Memorial Hospital, West Wing 279¸1611 NW 12th Avenue, Miami, FL, 33136, USA,

出版信息

Skeletal Radiol. 2015 Jun;44(6):831-7. doi: 10.1007/s00256-015-2111-y. Epub 2015 Feb 13.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aims of this article are to review the imaging characteristics of ischiofemoral impingement (IFI), summarize measurement thresholds for radiologic diagnosis based on a meta-analysis of the literature and raise awareness among radiologists and clinicians of this entity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A PubMed search restricted to the English language containing the keywords "ischiofemoral impingement" and "quadratus femoris MRI" was performed, and citations in these articles were also used to identify a total of 27 studies discussing ischiofemoral impingement. After excluding case reports and non-representative studies, there were five remaining articles including 193 hip MRIs of IFI in 154 subjects (133 female, 21 male) and 135 asymptomatic control hip MRIs from 74 subjects (55 female, 19 male). Additionally, we performed a retrospective database search of pelvic and hip MRI reports from our institution including the terms "quadratus femoris" or "ischiofemoral impingement" from a 9-year period and 24 hip MRIs from 21 patients (18 female, 3 male) with IFI with 5 asymptomatic contralateral control hip MRIs identified. In all, 217 hip MRIs of IFI and 140 control cases were included. A meta-analysis of these hip MRIs was conducted to determine optimal thresholds of the ischiofemoral space (IFS) and quadratus femoris space (QFS) for identifying IFI.

RESULTS

Cases of IFI showed significantly smaller IFS and QFS compared to controls (14.91 ± 4.8 versus 26.01 ± 7.98 and 9.57 ± 3.7 versus 15.97 ± 6.07, measured in mm, respectively, p < 0.0001 for both). Pooled analysis revealed that for IFS, using a cutoff of ≤ 15 mm yielded a sensitivity of 76.9%, specificity of 81.0% and overall accuracy of 78.3%. For QFS, a cutoff of ≤ 10.0 mm resulted in 78.7% sensitivity, 74.1% specificity and 77.1% overall accuracy.

CONCLUSION

IFI is a potential cause of hip pain that can be accurately diagnosed with MRI in conjunction with clinical findings. Using the proposed measurement thresholds may better identify patients with this impingement syndrome so that optimal treatment options can be pursued.

摘要

目的

本文旨在回顾坐骨股骨撞击症(IFI)的影像学特征,基于文献的荟萃分析总结放射学诊断的测量阈值,并提高放射科医生和临床医生对该病症的认识。

材料与方法

在PubMed上进行检索,限定语言为英语,关键词为“坐骨股骨撞击症”和“股方肌磁共振成像”,并利用这些文章中的参考文献来确定总共27项讨论坐骨股骨撞击症的研究。排除病例报告和非代表性研究后,剩余5篇文章,包括154名受试者(133名女性,21名男性)的193例IFI髋关节磁共振成像,以及74名受试者(55名女性,19名男性)的135例无症状对照髋关节磁共振成像。此外,我们对本机构9年期间包含“股方肌”或“坐骨股骨撞击症”的骨盆和髋关节磁共振成像报告进行了回顾性数据库检索,确定了21例IFI患者(18名女性,3名男性)的24例髋关节磁共振成像以及5例无症状对侧对照髋关节磁共振成像。总共纳入了217例IFI髋关节磁共振成像和140例对照病例。对这些髋关节磁共振成像进行荟萃分析,以确定用于识别IFI的坐骨股骨间隙(IFS)和股方肌间隙(QFS)的最佳阈值。

结果

与对照组相比,IFI病例的IFS和QFS显著更小(分别为14.91±4.8与26.01±7.98,以及9.57±3.7与15.97±6.07,单位为mm,两者p均<0.0001)。汇总分析显示,对于IFS,采用≤15mm的截断值时,敏感性为76.9%),特异性为81.0%,总体准确率为78.3%。对于QFS,≤10.0mm的截断值导致敏感性为78.7%,特异性为74.1%,总体准确率为77.1%。

结论

IFI是髋关节疼痛的一个潜在原因,结合临床发现,通过磁共振成像可准确诊断。使用所提出的测量阈值可能更好地识别患有这种撞击综合征的患者,从而能够寻求最佳的治疗方案。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验