Baertsch Nathan A, Baker-Herman Tracy L
Department of Comparative Biosciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.
Department of Comparative Biosciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2015 Apr 15;308(8):R700-7. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00359.2014. Epub 2015 Feb 11.
In many neural networks, mechanisms of compensatory plasticity respond to prolonged reductions in neural activity by increasing cellular excitability or synaptic strength. In the respiratory control system, a prolonged reduction in synaptic inputs to the phrenic motor pool elicits a TNF-α- and atypical PKC-dependent form of spinal plasticity known as inactivity-induced phrenic motor facilitation (iPMF). Although iPMF may be elicited by a prolonged reduction in respiratory neural activity, iPMF is more efficiently induced when reduced respiratory neural activity (neural apnea) occurs intermittently. Mechanisms giving rise to iPMF following intermittent neural apnea are unknown. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that iPMF following intermittent reductions in respiratory neural activity requires spinal TNF-α and aPKC. Phrenic motor output was recorded in anesthetized and ventilated rats exposed to brief intermittent (5, ∼1.25 min), brief sustained (∼6.25 min), or prolonged sustained (30 min) neural apnea. iPMF was elicited following brief intermittent and prolonged sustained neural apnea, but not following brief sustained neural apnea. Unlike iPMF following prolonged neural apnea, spinal TNF-α was not required to initiate iPMF during intermittent neural apnea; however, aPKC was still required for its stabilization. These results suggest that different patterns of respiratory neural activity induce iPMF through distinct cellular mechanisms but ultimately converge on a similar downstream pathway. Understanding the diverse cellular mechanisms that give rise to inactivity-induced respiratory plasticity may lead to development of novel therapeutic strategies to treat devastating respiratory control disorders when endogenous compensatory mechanisms fail.
在许多神经网络中,代偿性可塑性机制会通过增加细胞兴奋性或突触强度来应对神经活动的长期减少。在呼吸控制系统中,膈神经运动池突触输入的长期减少会引发一种依赖肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)和非典型蛋白激酶C(aPKC)的脊髓可塑性形式,即失用性膈神经运动易化(iPMF)。尽管iPMF可能由呼吸神经活动的长期减少引发,但当呼吸神经活动减少(神经呼吸暂停)间歇性发生时,iPMF能更有效地被诱导。间歇性神经呼吸暂停后引发iPMF的机制尚不清楚。本研究的目的是检验以下假设:间歇性呼吸神经活动减少后的iPMF需要脊髓TNF-α和aPKC。在暴露于短暂间歇性(5次,每次约1.25分钟)、短暂持续性(约6.25分钟)或长期持续性(30分钟)神经呼吸暂停的麻醉通气大鼠中记录膈神经运动输出。短暂间歇性和长期持续性神经呼吸暂停后会引发iPMF,但短暂持续性神经呼吸暂停后不会引发。与长期神经呼吸暂停后的iPMF不同,间歇性神经呼吸暂停期间启动iPMF不需要脊髓TNF-α;然而,aPKC对其稳定仍必不可少。这些结果表明,不同模式的呼吸神经活动通过不同的细胞机制诱导iPMF,但最终汇聚到相似的下游途径。了解引发失用性呼吸可塑性的多种细胞机制,可能会在内在代偿机制失效时,促成治疗严重呼吸控制障碍的新型治疗策略的开发。