González-Del-Castillo-McGrath Mauricio, Guizar-Mendoza Juan-Manuel, Madrigal-Orozco Catalina, Anguiano-Flores Laura, Amador-Licona Norma
Universidad De La Salle Bajío, Facultad de Odontología, León Guanajuato, México.
UMAE HE 1 Bajío, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro, Facultad de Odontología, León Guanajuato, México.
J Clin Exp Dent. 2014 Dec 1;6(5):e524-9. doi: 10.4317/jced.51662. eCollection 2014 Dec.
To determine the effectiveness of a motivational interviewing-based educational program in reducing the number and intensity of new caries and bacterial dental plaque levels at 6 months post randomization.
A randomized and single blind clinical trial in 100 schoolchildren between 6-10 years of age presenting the highest risk score of caries according to the Caries Management by Risk Assessment (CAMBRA) criteria was performed. These patients were randomized to two groups: control (in which the mothers initially received an oral prevention informative session) and experimental (in which the mothers received the initial informative session, followed by individual motivational interviewing sessions during a period of 6 months). The International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) scores and bacterial plaque were evaluated at baseline, at 6 and 12 months.
After 12 months, children in the experimental group had 2.12 ± 0.8 new caries versus 3.5 ± 0.9 in the control group (t=7.39; p<0.001). Caries in the experimental group was seen to be limited to the enamel, with a median intensity of 2 (range 0-3) versus 3 (0-6) in the control group (U=1594; p<0.0001). Bacterial plaque determined by the O'Leary index decreased in both groups; however, it decreased more in the experimental than in the control group (34.3 vs. 20.6; t=-3.12, p= 0.002) respectively.
Motivational interviewing is better than traditional educational programs in preventing caries and decreasing bacterial plaque. Key words:Health educational, motivational interviewing, caries risk.
确定一项基于动机性访谈的教育项目在随机分组后6个月时减少新发龋齿数量和严重程度以及牙菌斑水平的有效性。
对100名6至10岁、根据龋病风险评估管理(CAMBRA)标准龋病风险评分最高的学童进行了一项随机单盲临床试验。这些患者被随机分为两组:对照组(母亲最初接受一次口腔预防知识讲座)和试验组(母亲接受最初的知识讲座,随后在6个月内接受个体动机性访谈)。在基线、6个月和12个月时评估国际龋病检测和评估系统(ICDAS)评分及牙菌斑情况。
12个月后,试验组儿童有2.12±0.8颗新发龋齿,而对照组为3.5±0.9颗(t=7.39;p<0.001)。试验组龋齿仅限于牙釉质,严重程度中位数为2(范围0 - 3),而对照组为3(0 - 6)(U=1594;p<0.0001)。用奥利里指数测定的牙菌斑在两组中均减少;然而,试验组减少得比对照组更多(分别为34.3对20.6;t=-3.12,p = 0.002)。
在预防龋齿和减少牙菌斑方面,动机性访谈优于传统教育项目。关键词:健康教育,动机性访谈,龋病风险