Chen Peng-Yu, Cheng Skye Hung-Chun, Hung Chen-Fang, Yu Ben-Long, Chen Chii-Ming
Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Koo foundation Sun Yat-Sen Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Koo foundation Sun Yat-Sen Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan.
Springerplus. 2013 Nov 1;2:589. doi: 10.1186/2193-1801-2-589. eCollection 2013.
Locoregional therapy is rarely the standard of care for De Novo stage IV breast cancer but usually used for palliation of symptoms. This retrospective study aimed to determine whether surgery or radiation would contribute to survival benefit for this group of patients by examining the survival outcome through the disease molecular subtypes.
We reviewed 246 patients with de novo stage IV (M1) breast cancer treated at our hospital between 1990 and 2009. Multivariable Cox Analysis was used to evaluate the survival association with subtypes and clinicopathologic factors.
Patients with luminal-like subtype are mostly premonopausal (66.9%, P = 0.0002), with abnormal CA 15-3 level at initial diagnosis (58.7%, P = 0.01), a higher rate of bony metastases (78.5%, P = 0.02), and a lower rate of liver metastases (22.3%, P < 0.0001). Patients with HER2-enriched and triple negative showed higher rate of nuclear grade III, up to 35% and 40%, respectively (P = 0.01). There is no difference in treatment options patient received: systemic chemotherapy up to 82.2 ~ 95% (p = 0.0705), locoregional treatment up to 40.0 ~ 51.2% (P-0.2571). The median overall survival was 23.1 months: luminal-like subtype 39.6 months, HER2-enriched subtype 17.9 months, and triple negative subtype 13.3 months, respectively (P < 0.0001). In multivariate analysis, poor prognostic factors included HER2-enriched (HR 2.2, P < 0.0001) and triple negative subtype (HR 4.3, P < 0.0001), liver metastasis (HR 1.9, P < 0.0001), lung metastasis (HR 1.4, P = 0.0153), and bone metastasis (HR 1.8, P = 0.0007). Subgroup analysis revealed that local treatments (surgery or radiotherapy) to primary/regional tumors achieved better survival in patients with luminal-like (3-year survival 66.4% vs. 34.4%, p = 0.0001) and HER2-enriched (3-year survival 41.6% vs. 8.8%, p = 0.0012) subtypes, but not in triple negative subtype (P = 0.9575).
For better survival outcome, De Novo Stage IV breast cancer patients with luminal-like or HER2-enriched subtype should be offered local treatments when surgery and/or radiotherapy presents an option for proper control of the primary and regional tumors.
局部区域治疗很少成为初治IV期乳腺癌的标准治疗方案,但通常用于缓解症状。这项回顾性研究旨在通过检查疾病分子亚型的生存结果,确定手术或放疗是否会使该组患者获得生存益处。
我们回顾了1990年至2009年间在我院接受治疗的246例初治IV期(M1)乳腺癌患者。采用多变量Cox分析评估生存与亚型及临床病理因素的相关性。
管腔样亚型患者大多为绝经前(66.9%,P = 0.0002),初诊时CA 15-3水平异常(58.7%,P = 0.01),骨转移率较高(78.5%,P = 0.02),肝转移率较低(22.3%,P < 0.0001)。HER2富集型和三阴性患者的核分级III级率较高,分别高达至35%和40%(P = 0.01)。患者接受的治疗方案无差异:全身化疗高达82.2%至95%(p = 0.0705),局部区域治疗高达40.0%至51.2%(P = 0.2571)。中位总生存期为23.1个月:管腔样亚型为39.6个月,HER2富集型亚型为17.9个月,三阴性亚型为13.3个月,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.0001)。多变量分析中,不良预后因素包括HER2富集型(HR 2.2,P < 0.0001)和三阴性亚型(HR 4.3,P < 0.0001)、肝转移(HR 1.9,P < 0.0001)、肺转移(HR 1.4,P = 0.0153)和骨转移(HR 1.8,P = 0.0007)。亚组分析显示,对原发/区域肿瘤进行局部治疗(手术或放疗)在管腔样(3年生存率66.4%对vs. 34.4%,p = 0.0001)和HER2富集型(3年生存率41.6%对vs. 8.8%,p = 0.0012)亚型患者中可获得更好的生存,但在三阴性亚型中无差异(P = 0.9575)。
为获得更好的生存结果,对于初治IV期乳腺癌管腔样或HER2富集型亚型患者,当手术和/或放疗可作为适当控制原发和区域肿瘤的选择时,应提供局部治疗。