Tano Shunsuke, Horiki Noriyuki, Omata Fumio, Tanaka Kyosuke, Hamada Yasuhiko, Katsurahara Masaki, Ninomiya Katsuhito, Nishikawa Kenichiro, Nojiri Keiichiro, Yamada Reiko, Inoue Hiroyuki, Gabazza Esteban C, Katayama Naoyuki, Takei Yoshiyuki
From the Department of Endoscopic Medicine, Mie University Hospital (ST, NH, KT, YH, MK); Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu (ST, KN, KN, KN, RY, HI, YT); Department of Internal Medicine, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo (FO); Department of Immunology (ECG); and Department of Hematology and Oncology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu, Mei, Japan (NK).
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Feb;94(6):e491. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000491.
The efficacy of 2nd-look esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) with endoscopic hemostatic therapy (EHT) for the prevention of postendoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) clinical bleeding remains controversial. The aim of this study was to estimate post-ESD bleeding rate using 2nd and 3rd-look strategy, and to determine risk factors for clinical bleeding, and for EHT at 2nd and 3rd-look EGDs.Three hundred forty-four consecutive patients with early gastric cancer or adenoma underwent ESD from January 2006 through March 2012. Second and 3rd-look EGDs were performed on day 1 (D1) and day 7 (D7), respectively, with EHT as needed.Post-ESD clinical bleeding rate was 2.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2%-4.9%). For clinical bleeding, adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for age <65 years and antithrombotic drug uses were 4.40 (95% CI 1.07-19.93) and 7.34 (95% CI 1.80-32.48), respectively. For D1 EHT, adjusted ORs of tumor location in the lower part of the stomach and maximum tumor diameter ≥60 mm were 2.16 (95% CI 1.35-3.51) and 2.20 (95% CI 1.05-4.98), respectively. For D7 EHT, adjusted OR of D1 EHT was 4.65 (95% CI 1.56-20.0).Post-ESD clinical bleeding rate was relatively low using 2nd and 3rd-look strategy. Age <65 years and antithrombotic drug use are significant risk factors for clinical bleeding. Regarding EHT, tumor location in the lower part of the stomach and maximum diameter of resected specimen ≥60 mm are significant predictors for D1 EHT. D1 EHT in turn is a significant risk factor for D7 EHT. The efficacy of sequential strategy for preventing post-ESD bleeding is promising.
第二次胃镜检查(EGD)联合内镜止血治疗(EHT)预防内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)后临床出血的疗效仍存在争议。本研究的目的是采用第二次和第三次胃镜检查策略评估ESD后出血率,并确定临床出血以及第二次和第三次胃镜检查时进行EHT的危险因素。
2006年1月至2012年3月,连续344例早期胃癌或腺瘤患者接受了ESD。分别在第1天(D1)和第7天(D7)进行第二次和第三次胃镜检查,并根据需要进行EHT。
ESD后临床出血率为2.6%(95%置信区间[CI]1.2%-4.9%)。对于临床出血,年龄<65岁和使用抗血栓药物的调整优势比(OR)分别为4.40(95%CI 1.07-19.93)和7.34(95%CI 1.80-32.48)。对于D1 EHT,胃下部肿瘤位置和最大肿瘤直径≥60mm的调整OR分别为2.16(95%CI 1.35-3.51)和2.20(95%CI 1.05-4.98)。对于D7 EHT,D1 EHT的调整OR为4.65(95%CI 1.56-20.0)。
采用第二次和第三次胃镜检查策略,ESD后临床出血率相对较低。年龄<65岁和使用抗血栓药物是临床出血的重要危险因素。关于EHT,胃下部肿瘤位置和切除标本最大直径≥60mm是D1 EHT的重要预测因素。反过来,D1 EHT是D7 EHT的重要危险因素。序贯策略预防ESD后出血的疗效很有前景。