Neonatal male circumcision, if not already commonplace, would be plainly unacceptable by modern ethical standards.
作者信息
Myers Alex
机构信息
a Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
出版信息
Am J Bioeth. 2015;15(2):54-5. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2014.990166.
PMID:25674962
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Neonatal male circumcision, if not already commonplace, would be plainly unacceptable by modern ethical standards.
Am J Bioeth. 2015;15(2):54-5. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2014.990166.
2
Cutting both ways: on the ethical entanglements of human rights, rites, and genital mutilation.
Am J Bioeth. 2015;15(2):50-1. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2014.990167.
3
Sex and circumcision.
Am J Bioeth. 2015;15(2):43-5. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2014.991000.
4
The tolerance of ritual male infant circumcision.
Am J Bioeth. 2015;15(2):48-9. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2014.990165.
5
Response to open peer commentaries on "ritual male infant circumcision and human rights".
Am J Bioeth. 2015;15(3):W1-4. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2015.1000064.
6
The Jacobs Parental Prerogative Test.
Am J Bioeth. 2015;15(2):52-3. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2014.990764.
7
Ritual male infant circumcision: the consequences and the principles say yes.
Am J Bioeth. 2015;15(2):56-8. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2014.990164.
8
Growing world consensus to leave circumcision decision to the affected individual.
Am J Bioeth. 2015;15(2):46-8. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2014.990760.
9
The Mysterious Disappearance of the Object of Inquiry: Jacobs and Arora's Defense of Circumcision.
Am J Bioeth. 2015;15(5):70-2. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2015.1026236.
10
Response to "The Mysterious Disappearance of the Object of Inquiry: Jacobs and Arora's Defense of Circumcision".
Am J Bioeth. 2015;15(8):W4-5. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2015.1058119.
Zotero 插件