Larsen Bethany, Jacofsky Marc C, Jacofsky David J
The CORE Institute, Phoenix, Arizona.
J Arthroplasty. 2015 Jun;30(6):1062-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.01.014. Epub 2015 Jan 21.
Gait of single-radius (SR, n=16) and multi-radius (MR, n=16) posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasties was compared, along with controls (n=16), pre-op and 1 year post-op. Computer navigation and standard order sets controlled confounding variables. Post-operatively, SR knees did not differ from controls while MR knees continued to differ in important knee kinetic and kinematic properties. MR knees remained more extended (P=0.019) and had decreased power absorption (P=0.0001) during weight acceptance compared to the SR knees. Both surgical groups had similar KSS for Knee Scores (P=0.22) and Function Scores (P=0.58). The significant biomechanical differences are likely influenced by patella-femoral moment arm geometry and changing ligament laxity throughout the active range of motion.
比较了单半径(SR,n = 16)和多半径(MR,n = 16)后稳定型全膝关节置换术的步态,同时与对照组(n = 16)进行比较,包括术前和术后1年。计算机导航和标准医嘱集控制了混杂变量。术后,SR膝关节与对照组无差异,而MR膝关节在重要的膝关节动力学和运动学特性方面仍存在差异。与SR膝关节相比,MR膝关节在负重时保持更伸展(P = 0.019),且功率吸收降低(P = 0.0001)。两个手术组在膝关节评分(P = 0.22)和功能评分(P = 0.58)方面的膝关节协会评分(KSS)相似。显著的生物力学差异可能受髌股力矩臂几何形状和整个活动范围内韧带松弛度变化的影响。