Fontana D J, McCloskey T C, Jolly S K, Commissaris R L
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy & AHP, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48202.
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1989 Mar;32(3):807-13. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(89)90038-5.
The present studies were designed to evaluate the effects of beta-adrenoceptor antagonists and traditional anxiolytics (phenobarbital and diazepam), alone and in combination, on behavior in the Conditioned Suppressioned of Drinking (CSD) conflict paradigm, an "animal model" for the study of anxiety and antianxiety agents. In daily 10-minute sessions, water-deprived rats were trained to drink from a tube which was occasionally electrified (0.5 mA), electrification being signalled by the presence of a tone. Within 2-3 weeks, control responding had stabilized (10-15 shocks/session and 10-15 ml water/session); drug tests were then conducted at weekly intervals. As expected, diazepam (0.6-10 mg/kg) and phenobarbital (10-40 mg/kg) administration resulted in a marked and dose-dependent increase in punished responding at doses which did not markedly alter background responding (water intake). Neither propranolol (0.5-8 mg/kg) nor the beta-1-selective antagonist atenolol (1-16 mg/kg) significantly affected punished responding in the CSD. Both propranolol and atenolol produced significant beta-1-adrenoceptor blockade, as evidenced by the production of significant bradycardic effects in conscious rats at the doses employed. Pretreatment with 2.0 mg/kg propranolol did not alter the anticonflict effects of diazepam (0.6-10 mg/kg) or phenobarbital (10-40 mg/kg). Further, reduction of the shock intensity to 0.125 mA (i.e., decreased suppression) failed to alter the behavioral response to propranolol (1.5-5 mg/kg) or the interaction of 2.0 mg/kg propranolol with diazepam. Finally, chronic administration of propranolol (2.0 mg/kg, twice daily) did not affect punished responding over the course of 5 weeks of treatment. These data suggest that the CSD paradigm, although an effective "animal model" for the study of benzodiazepine and barbiturate anticonflict effects, cannot serve as an "animal model" for the study of the situation-specific (i.e., phobic) anxiety for which propranolol and related agents are presently used.
本研究旨在评估β-肾上腺素能受体拮抗剂与传统抗焦虑药(苯巴比妥和地西泮)单独使用及联合使用时,对饮水条件性抑制(CSD)冲突范式中行为的影响,该范式是用于研究焦虑和抗焦虑药物的一种“动物模型”。在每天10分钟的实验环节中,对禁水的大鼠进行训练,使其从一根偶尔会通电(0.5毫安)的管子饮水,通电由一个音调提示。在2至3周内,对照反应趋于稳定(每次实验10 - 15次电击和10 - 15毫升水);然后每周进行一次药物测试。正如预期的那样,给予地西泮(0.6 - 10毫克/千克)和苯巴比妥(10 - 40毫克/千克)后,在不显著改变背景反应(水摄入量)的剂量下,惩罚反应出现显著且剂量依赖性的增加。普萘洛尔(0.5 - 8毫克/千克)和β-1选择性拮抗剂阿替洛尔(1 - 16毫克/千克)均未显著影响CSD中的惩罚反应。普萘洛尔和阿替洛尔均产生了显著的β-1肾上腺素能受体阻滞作用,在所使用的剂量下,清醒大鼠出现显著的心动过缓效应即证明了这一点。用2.0毫克/千克普萘洛尔预处理并未改变地西泮(0.6 - 10毫克/千克)或苯巴比妥(10 - 40毫克/千克)的抗冲突效应。此外,将电击强度降低至0.125毫安(即抑制作用减弱)并未改变对普萘洛尔(1.5 - 5毫克/千克)的行为反应,也未改变2.0毫克/千克普萘洛尔与地西泮的相互作用。最后,长期给予普萘洛尔(2.0毫克/千克,每日两次)在为期5周的治疗过程中并未影响惩罚反应。这些数据表明,CSD范式虽然是研究苯二氮䓬类和巴比妥类抗冲突效应的有效“动物模型”,但不能作为研究普萘洛尔及相关药物目前所用于治疗的情境特异性(即恐惧性)焦虑的“动物模型”。