Senoo Keitaro, Lip Gregory Y H
Centre for Cardiovascular Sciences, City Hospital, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Semin Thromb Hemost. 2015 Mar;41(2):146-53. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1544156. Epub 2015 Feb 15.
The non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs), such as the thrombin inhibitor (dabigatran) and the direct factor Xa inhibitors (rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban), have been shown to be at least as efficacious and safe as conventional oral anticoagulants, such as the vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) (e.g., warfarin), for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Each NOAC has various advantages and specific features, and therefore decisions regarding appropriate stroke prevention require individual assessment of stroke and bleeding risk on anticoagulation with VKA therapy and NOACs when starting on any of these drugs. This review briefly describes the results of the four NOACs clinical randomized trials and discusses how they might impact clinical practice and choice of anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation patients. Moreover, this review discusses the differences of the proposed management of antithrombotic therapy in several international guidelines and pragmatic issues of NOACs for stroke prophylaxis.
非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝药(NOACs),如凝血酶抑制剂(达比加群)和直接Xa因子抑制剂(利伐沙班、阿哌沙班和依度沙班),已被证明在预防非瓣膜性心房颤动(NVAF)患者中风方面至少与传统口服抗凝药,如维生素K拮抗剂(VKAs)(如华法林)一样有效且安全。每种NOAC都有各种优点和特定特征,因此,在开始使用任何一种此类药物时,关于适当的中风预防决策需要对使用VKA治疗和NOACs进行抗凝治疗时的中风和出血风险进行个体评估。本综述简要描述了四项NOACs临床随机试验的结果,并讨论了它们如何可能影响房颤患者的临床实践和抗凝剂选择。此外,本综述讨论了几个国际指南中提出的抗栓治疗管理差异以及NOACs用于中风预防的实际问题。