Suppr超能文献

ABO血型与支架内再狭窄风险的关联

Association of ABO blood types with the risk of in-stent restenosis.

作者信息

Pourafkari L, Ghaffari S, Ahmadi M, Tajlil A, Nader N D

机构信息

Cardiovascular Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.

Department of Anesthesiology, State University of New York at Buffalo, NY, USA

出版信息

Perfusion. 2015 Sep;30(6):507-13. doi: 10.1177/0267659115573098. Epub 2015 Feb 16.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the prevalence of in-stent restenosis (ISR) in patients with various ABO blood types.

METHODS

Clinical information from 150 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of ISR and 150 patients with a diagnosis of patent coronary stents in the secondary angiography was collected. Comprehensive demographic and laboratory data, including ABO and Rhesus blood groups, as well as comorbid conditions and vessel and stent characteristics, were recorded for each patient. The association of ABO blood groups with the risk of ISR before and after controlling for coronary risk factors was determined. Categorical data were analyzed with the Chi-square test and numerical values were analyzed with t-tests. Binary logistic regression models were constructed to compare type A and non-A for the frequency of risk factors.

RESULTS

A total of 392 stents were implanted in 300 patients. Two hundred and fourteen stents (54.6%) were patent and 178 stents (45.4%) were stenosed. Blood group A was significantly more common in the ISR group (43.3% vs. 28.7%, p=0.03). However, the frequencies of other blood types, as well as Rh antigen, were similar between the two groups. Triglyceride and low-density lipoproteins were the only significantly different variables (221 ± 198 mg/dL vs. 138 ± 76 mg/dL, p<0.001 and 108 ± 36 mg/dL vs. 96 ± 73 mg/dL, p=0.04, in type-A vs. non-A, respectively). After matching for coronary risk factors, there was no difference between A blood type patients and their controls.

CONCLUSION

ISR is significantly more prevalent in individuals with the type A blood group. However, this higher association is most likely due to higher atherogenic conditions in patients within this population.

摘要

目的

研究不同ABO血型患者支架内再狭窄(ISR)的发生率。

方法

收集150例确诊为ISR患者及150例二次血管造影显示冠状动脉支架通畅患者的临床信息。记录每位患者的综合人口统计学和实验室数据,包括ABO血型和Rh血型、合并症以及血管和支架特征。确定在控制冠状动脉危险因素前后ABO血型与ISR风险的关联。分类数据采用卡方检验分析,数值采用t检验分析。构建二元逻辑回归模型比较A型与非A型危险因素的频率。

结果

300例患者共植入392个支架。214个支架(54.6%)通畅,178个支架(45.4%)狭窄。A型血在ISR组中明显更常见(43.3%对28.7%,p = 0.03)。然而,两组中其他血型以及Rh抗原的频率相似。甘油三酯和低密度脂蛋白是仅有的显著不同变量(A型与非A型患者分别为221±198mg/dL对138±76mg/dL,p<0.001;108±36mg/dL对96±73mg/dL,p = 0.04)。在匹配冠状动脉危险因素后,A型血患者与其对照组之间无差异。

结论

A型血个体中ISR的发生率明显更高。然而,这种较高的关联很可能是由于该人群患者中动脉粥样硬化情况更严重。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验