Leccisotti Lucia, Gambacorta Maria Antonietta, de Waure Chiara, Stefanelli Antonella, Barbaro Brunella, Vecchio Fabio Maria, Coco Claudio, Persiani Roberto, Crucitti Antonio, Tortorelli Antonino Pio, Giordano Alessandro, Valentini Vincenzo
Institute of Nuclear Medicine, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo A. Gemelli, 8, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015 Apr;42(5):657-66. doi: 10.1007/s00259-014-2820-9. Epub 2015 Feb 17.
To evaluate whether metabolic changes in the primary tumour during and after preoperative radiochemotherapy (RCT) can predict the histopathological response in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer as well as disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).
Consecutive patients with cT2-4 N0-2 rectal adenocarcinoma were included. (18)F-FDG PET/CT was performed at baseline, at the end of the second week of RCT (early PET/CT) and before surgery (late PET/CT). The PET/CT results were compared with histopathological data (ypT0 N0 vs. ypT1-4 N0-2 as well as TRG1 vs.TRG2-5) and survival.
The study included 126 patients. Among 124 patients in whom TNM classification was available, 28 (22.6 %) were ypT0 N0, and among all 126 patients, 31 (24.6 %) were TRG1. The areas under the curve of the early response index (RI) for identifying non-complete pathological response (non-cPR) were 0.74 (95 % CI 0.61 - 0.87) for ypT1-4 N0-2 patients and 0.75 (95 % CI 0.62 - 0.88) for TRG2-5 patients. The optimal cut-off for differentiating patients with non-cPR and cPR was found to be a reduction of 61.2 % (83.1 % sensitivity and 65 % specificity in ypT1-4 N0-2 patients; 85.4 % sensitivity and 65.2 % specificity in TRG2-5 patients). The optimal cut-off for late RI could not be found. The qualitative analysis of images obtained after RCT demonstrated 81.5 % sensitivity and 61.3 % specificity in predicting TRG2-5. After a median follow-up of 68 months, the low number of patients with local/distant recurrence or who had died did not allow the value of PET/CT for predicting DFS and OS to be calculated.
The early assessment of response to RCT by (18)F-FDG PET/CT can predict non-cPR allowing practical modification of preoperative treatment. Conversely, late RI is not sufficiently accurate for guiding the decision as to whether local excision or even observation is appropriate in an individual patient. Qualitative analysis of late PET/CT images is also not sensitive enough alone to rule out the presence of residual disease.
评估术前放化疗(RCT)期间及之后原发肿瘤的代谢变化是否能够预测局部晚期直肠癌患者的组织病理学反应以及无病生存期(DFS)和总生存期(OS)。
纳入连续的cT2-4 N0-2直肠腺癌患者。在基线、RCT第二周结束时(早期PET/CT)以及手术前(晚期PET/CT)进行(18)F-FDG PET/CT检查。将PET/CT结果与组织病理学数据(ypT0 N0对比ypT1-4 N0-2以及TRG1对比TRG2-5)和生存期进行比较。
该研究纳入了126例患者。在124例可获得TNM分期的患者中,28例(22.6%)为ypT0 N0,在全部126例患者中,31例(24.6%)为TRG1。用于识别非完全病理反应(non-cPR)的早期反应指数(RI)曲线下面积,对于ypT1-4 N0-2患者为0.74(95%CI 0.61 - 0.87),对于TRG2-5患者为0.75(95%CI 0.62 - 0.88)。区分non-cPR和cPR患者的最佳截断值为降低61.2%(在ypT1-4 N0-2患者中敏感性为83.1%,特异性为65%;在TRG2-5患者中敏感性为85.4%,特异性为65.2%)。未找到晚期RI的最佳截断值。RCT后获得的图像定性分析在预测TRG2-5方面显示敏感性为81.5%,特异性为61.3%。中位随访68个月后,局部/远处复发或死亡患者数量较少,无法计算PET/CT对DFS和OS的预测价值。
通过(18)F-FDG PET/CT对RCT反应进行早期评估可预测non-cPR,从而对术前治疗进行实际调整。相反,晚期RI在指导个体患者是否适合局部切除甚至观察的决策方面不够准确。晚期PET/CT图像的定性分析单独使用时也不够敏感,无法排除残留疾病的存在。