Verma Usha, Astudillo-Dávalos Fausto E, Gerkowicz Sabrina A
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, 1611 NW 12th Ave., Miami, FL 33136 USA.
Contraception. 2015 Jul;92(1):77-80. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.02.008. Epub 2015 Feb 21.
To evaluate the efficacy and difference in cost of ultrasound guided removal of retained intrauterine device (IUD).
A total of 23 women underwent ultrasound-guided retrieval of retained IUDs between January 2013 and March 2014. Transvaginal ultrasound was performed in all cases to assess the localization of the IUD. Under transabdominal ultrasound guidance, either the crochet type IUD hook (Gyneas, Goussainville, France) or Alligator forceps were used to grasp the IUD and remove it from the uterine cavity. The costs of the ultrasound guided procedure and the hysteroscopic removal of the IUD were compared.
Twenty-three patients who failed IUD removal in the clinic were referred to our department for ultrasound-guided removal. All patients had an IUD present in the uterine cavity. Eleven patients had Paragard IUDs (48%), eight had Mirena IUDs (35%), three had Lippes loop (13%), and one had a ring IUD (4%). The patients' ages ranged from 20-56 years. The IUDs were in place for 8 months to 23 years. Of the 23 patients with retained IUDs, 19 were successfully removed (83%), and 4 underwent hysteroscopic removal of IUD. The IUD removal cost in the operating room on average was $3562 US dollars and the cost of ultrasound-guided removal was $465 US dollars.
Retained intrauterine devices with or without strings can often be safely removed in an office-based setting under ultrasound guidance at less cost than in the operating room, even in cases with embedded IUDs.
Our experience leads us to propose in-office IUD removal under ultrasound guidance as the first line in management of retained IUDs after failed removal by conventional practices. Ultrasound provides numerous advantages including direct visualization in a less invasive manner than hysteroscopy. Three-dimensional imaging can also be used for enhanced perspective.
评估超声引导下取出宫内节育器(IUD)的疗效及成本差异。
2013年1月至2014年3月期间,共有23名女性接受了超声引导下取出残留IUD的操作。所有病例均进行经阴道超声检查以评估IUD的位置。在经腹超声引导下,使用钩型IUD钩(法国古桑维尔的Gyneas)或鳄嘴钳抓取IUD并将其从宫腔内取出。比较了超声引导下操作及宫腔镜取出IUD的成本。
23名在诊所取出IUD失败的患者被转至我科进行超声引导下取出。所有患者宫腔内均有IUD。11名患者使用的是铜套节育器(48%),8名使用曼月乐IUD(35%),3名使用利普斯环(13%),1名使用环形IUD(4%)。患者年龄在20至56岁之间。IUD在位时间为8个月至23年。23名残留IUD的患者中,19名成功取出(83%),4名接受了宫腔镜下IUD取出术。手术室IUD取出平均成本为3562美元,超声引导下取出成本为465美元。
无论有无尾丝的残留宫内节育器,通常都可以在超声引导下在门诊环境中安全取出,成本低于手术室,即使是IUD嵌入的情况。
我们的经验使我们建议将超声引导下门诊取出IUD作为传统方法取出失败后残留IUD管理的一线方法。超声具有许多优点,包括以比宫腔镜侵入性更小的方式进行直接可视化。三维成像也可用于增强视野。