Opie L H
Heart Research Unit, University of Cape Town, Medical School, South Africa.
Circulation. 1989 Oct;80(4):1049-62. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.80.4.1049.
Reperfusion injury includes a spectrum of events, such as reperfusion arrhythmias, vascular damage and no-reflow, and myocardial functional stunning. The concept of reperfusion injury remains controversial with many proposed mechanisms when applied to humans, whereas in animal models, there are two main proposed mechanisms: calcium over-load and formation of oxygen free radicals. To prove that reperfusion injury is specifically caused by reperfusion would require evidence that an intervention given at the time of reperfusion can diminish or abolish the injury as in the case of arrhythmias, which are thought to be mediated by excess recycling of cytosolic calcium with delayed afterdepolarizations and ventricular automaticity. In the case of myocardial stunning, the phenomenon may be mediated, at least in part, by a burst of free radicals formed within the first minute of reperfusion and improved by free radical scavengers given at the time of reperfusion. The alternate hypothesis is that cytosolic calcium overload damages mechanisms for normal intracellular calcium regulation so that the stunned myocardium responds to agents that are thought to increase intracellular cytosolic calcium, such as beta-receptor agonists. A further component of reperfusion injury, under active investigation, is microvascular damage with alterations at the level of platelets, leukocytes, and endothelial integrity. From the therapeutic point of view, the divergent results of experimental interventions and the possibility that the abrupt onset of reperfusion in animals differs from the situation in humans with thrombolysis means that the best way currently available to limit reperfusion injury is by minimizing the ischemic period by early reperfusion and by optimizing the metabolic status of the ischemic myocardium at the end of the ischemic period.
再灌注损伤包括一系列事件,如再灌注心律失常、血管损伤和无复流现象,以及心肌功能顿抑。再灌注损伤的概念在应用于人类时,由于存在许多提出的机制,仍然存在争议;而在动物模型中,主要提出了两种机制:钙超载和氧自由基的形成。要证明再灌注损伤是由再灌注特异性引起的,需要有证据表明在再灌注时给予的干预措施能够减轻或消除损伤,就像心律失常的情况一样,心律失常被认为是由胞质钙的过度循环以及延迟后去极化和心室自律性介导的。就心肌顿抑而言,这种现象可能至少部分是由再灌注第一分钟内形成的自由基爆发所介导的,并且在再灌注时给予自由基清除剂可使其得到改善。另一种假说是,胞质钙超载会损害正常的细胞内钙调节机制,从而使顿抑心肌对被认为会增加细胞内胞质钙的药物(如β受体激动剂)产生反应。正在积极研究的再灌注损伤的另一个组成部分是微血管损伤,其在血小板、白细胞和内皮完整性水平上发生改变。从治疗的角度来看,实验性干预的不同结果以及动物再灌注突然开始的情况可能与人类溶栓时的情况不同,这意味着目前限制再灌注损伤的最佳方法是通过早期再灌注尽量缩短缺血期,并在缺血期末优化缺血心肌的代谢状态。