Strosberg Jonathan R, Fisher George A, Benson Al B, Anthony Lowell B, Arslan Bulent, Gibbs John F, Greeno Edward, Iyer Renuka V, Kim Michelle K, Maples William J, Philip Philip A, Wolin Edward M, Cherepanov Dasha, Broder Michael S
Jonathan R Strosberg, Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, United States.
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Feb 28;21(8):2450-9. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i8.2450.
To evaluate systemic treatment choices in unresectable metastatic well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) and provide consensus treatment recommendations.
Systemic treatment options for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors have expanded in recent years to include somatostatin analogs, angiogenesis inhibitors, inhibitors of mammalian target of rapamycin and cytotoxic agents. At this time, there is little data to guide treatment selection and sequence. We therefore assembled a panel of expert physicians to evaluate systemic treatment choices and provide consensus treatment recommendations. Treatment appropriateness ratings were collected using the RAND/UCLA modified Delphi process. After studying the literature, a multidisciplinary panel of 10 physicians assessed the appropriateness of various medical treatment scenarios on a 1-9 scale. Ratings were done both before and after an extended discussion of the evidence. Quantitative measurements of agreement were made and consensus statements developed from the second round ratings.
Specialties represented were medical and surgical oncology, interventional radiology, and gastroenterology. Panelists had practiced for a mean of 15.5 years (range: 6-33). Among 202 rated scenarios, disagreement decreased from 13.2% (26 scenarios) before the face-to-face discussion of evidence to 1% (2) after. In the final ratings, 46.5% (94 scenarios) were rated inappropriate, 21.8% (44) were uncertain, and 30.7% (62) were appropriate. Consensus statements from the scenarios included: (1) it is appropriate to use somatostatin analogs as first line therapy in patients with hormonally functional tumors and may be appropriate in patients who are asymptomatic; (2) it is appropriate to use everolimus, sunitinib, or cytotoxic chemotherapy therapy as first line therapy in patients with symptomatic or progressive tumors; and (3) beyond first line, these same agents can be used. In patients with uncontrolled secretory symptoms, octreotide LAR doses can be titrated up to 60 mg every 4 wk or up to 40 mg every 3 or 4 wk.
Using the Delphi process allowed physician experts to systematically obtain a consensus on the appropriateness of a variety of medical therapies in patients with PNETs.
评估不可切除转移性高分化胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤(PNETs)的全身治疗选择,并提供共识性治疗建议。
近年来,胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤的全身治疗选择有所增加,包括生长抑素类似物、血管生成抑制剂、雷帕霉素靶蛋白抑制剂和细胞毒性药物。目前,几乎没有数据可指导治疗选择和顺序。因此,我们召集了一组专家医生来评估全身治疗选择并提供共识性治疗建议。使用兰德/加州大学洛杉矶分校改良的德尔菲法收集治疗适宜性评级。在研究文献后,一个由10名医生组成的多学科小组以1至9分的量表评估各种医疗治疗方案的适宜性。在对证据进行深入讨论之前和之后都进行了评级。进行了一致性的定量测量,并根据第二轮评级制定了共识声明。
代表的专业领域包括医学肿瘤学、外科肿瘤学、介入放射学和胃肠病学。小组成员的平均执业年限为15.5年(范围:6至33年)。在202个评级方案中,分歧从面对面讨论证据前的13.2%(26个方案)降至讨论后的1%(2个)。在最终评级中,46.5%(94个方案)被评为不适当,21.8%(44个)不确定,30.7%(62个)适当。这些方案的共识声明包括:(1)对于有激素功能的肿瘤患者,使用生长抑素类似物作为一线治疗是合适的,对于无症状患者可能也是合适的;(2)对于有症状或病情进展的肿瘤患者,使用依维莫司、舒尼替尼或细胞毒性化疗作为一线治疗是合适的;(3)一线治疗之外,可使用相同的药物。对于分泌症状未得到控制的患者,奥曲肽长效注射剂的剂量可滴定至每4周60毫克或每3或4周40毫克。
使用德尔菲法使专家医生能够就PNETs患者各种医学治疗方法 的适宜性系统地达成共识。