Ferrucci Pier F, Minchella Ida, Mosconi Massimo, Gandini Sara, Verrecchia Francesco, Cocorocchio Emilia, Passoni Claudia, Pari Chiara, Testori Alessandro, Coco Paola, Munzone Elisabetta
aOncology of Melanoma Unit bEarly Drug Development for Innovative Therapies Division cDermatoncological Division dDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, European Institute of Oncology, Milan eRoche S.p.A., Monza, Italy.
Melanoma Res. 2015 Jun;25(3):239-45. doi: 10.1097/CMR.0000000000000146.
The combined treatment of dacarbazine with an antiangiogenic drug such as bevacizumab may potentiate the therapeutic effects of dacarbazine in metastatic melanoma (MM). Preliminary antitumour activity of dacarbazine plus bevacizumab is evaluated, together with the toxicity and safety profile, in MM patients. This prospective, open-label, phase II study included patients with previously untreated MM or unresectable melanoma. Patients received dacarbazine and bevacizumab until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity. The primary efficacy variable was the overall response rate. The secondary efficacy parameters included duration of response, duration of stable disease, time to progression/progression-free survival, time to treatment failure and overall survival. The safety analysis included recordings of adverse events and exposure to study treatment. The intention-to-treat population included 37 patients (24 men and 13 women, mean age 54.2±13.1 years). Overall response rate was 18.9% (seven patients achieved a response) and clinical benefit was 48.6%. In patients who achieved a response, the median duration of response was 16.9 months and the median duration of stable disease was 12.5 months. The median time to progression/progression-free survival and time to treatment failure were 5.5 and 3.1 months, respectively. The median overall survival was 11.4 months. Almost all patients (94.6%) experienced at least one adverse event; however, no new area of toxicity of bevacizumab emerged. The dacarbazine/bevacizumab combination provides benefits compared with dacarbazine monotherapy in historical controls, with an acceptable safety profile. This combination appears to be a valid option in specific subgroups of patients, namely, those triple negative (BRAF, C-KIT and NRAS wild type) or with a BRAF mutation who have already received, or are not eligible for, immunomodulating or targeted agents.
达卡巴嗪与抗血管生成药物(如贝伐单抗)联合治疗可能会增强达卡巴嗪对转移性黑色素瘤(MM)的治疗效果。在MM患者中评估了达卡巴嗪加贝伐单抗的初步抗肿瘤活性以及毒性和安全性。这项前瞻性、开放标签的II期研究纳入了先前未接受过治疗的MM或不可切除黑色素瘤患者。患者接受达卡巴嗪和贝伐单抗治疗,直至疾病进展或出现不可接受的毒性。主要疗效变量为总缓解率。次要疗效参数包括缓解持续时间、疾病稳定持续时间、进展时间/无进展生存期、治疗失败时间和总生存期。安全性分析包括不良事件记录和研究治疗暴露情况。意向性治疗人群包括37例患者(24例男性和13例女性,平均年龄54.2±13.1岁)。总缓解率为18.9%(7例患者获得缓解),临床获益率为48.6%。在获得缓解的患者中,缓解持续时间中位数为16.9个月,疾病稳定持续时间中位数为12.5个月。进展时间/无进展生存期和治疗失败时间中位数分别为5.5个月和3.1个月。总生存期中位数为11.4个月。几乎所有患者(94.6%)都经历了至少一次不良事件;然而,未出现贝伐单抗新的毒性领域。与历史对照中的达卡巴嗪单药治疗相比,达卡巴嗪/贝伐单抗联合治疗具有益处,且安全性可接受。这种联合治疗似乎是特定亚组患者的有效选择,即那些三阴性(BRAF、C-KIT和NRAS野生型)或已接受或不符合免疫调节或靶向药物治疗条件的BRAF突变患者。