Are sporadic fidgety movements as clinically relevant as is their absence?

BACKGROUND

Infants with normal fidgety movements at 3 to 5 months after term are very likely to show neurologically normal development, while the absence of fidgety movements is an early marker for an adverse neurological outcome, mainly cerebral palsy (CP). The clinical significance of so-called sporadic fidgety movements (i.e., fidgety movements occur isolated in a few body parts and are of 1- to 3-second-duration) is not yet known.

AIMS

Our objective was to determine whether infants who had developed CP and had sporadic fidgety movements have a better outcome than infants who did not have fidgety movements.

STUDY DESIGN

Longitudinal study. Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data.

SUBJECTS

61 infants who developed CP (46 male, 15 female; 29 infants born preterm; videoed for the assessment of movements and postures at 9 to 16 weeks post-term age).

OUTCOME MEASURES

The Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) was applied at 3 to 5 years of age.

RESULTS

There was no difference between children diagnosed with CP who had sporadic fidgety movements at 9 to 16 weeks post-term age (n = 9) and those who never developed fidgety movements (n = 50) with regard to their functional mobility and activity limitation at 3 to 5 years of age. One infant had normal FMs and developed unilateral CP, GMFCS Level I; the remaining infant had abnormal FMs and developed bilateral CP, GMFCS Level II.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no evidence that the occurrence of occasional isolated fidgety bursts indicates a milder type of CP.