Báča V, Marvanová Z, Štefela J, Hašplová K, Kachlík D, Džupa V
Ústav anatomie 3. LF UK v Praze.
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2015;82(1):48-50.
The study was designed to investigate whether anatomical variations of the anterior and posterior divisions of the internal iliac artery and their branches are associated with different risks of bleeding resulting from injury to the posterior pelvic segment.
The study was carried out on 19 cadavers. The dissected area included the internal iliac artery from the common iliac artery bifurcation to the origins of the superior gluteal artery, the inferior gluteal artery and the internal pudendal artery. Using an electronic slide rule, distances between the bifurcation and the origin of each branch from either the anterior or the posterior division were measured. The diameter of each vessel was also determined. Findings of the study were compared with variations described in the literature. The degree of risk for bleeding related to different anatomical variations of the internal iliac artery and its branches was evaluated based on the proximity to the bone.
There are six anatomical variations of internal iliac artery branches. Four of them were found: type A1 was recorded in 10 specimens, type A2 in six, type B1 in two and type C in one specimen. Types B2 and D were not seen.
The type B2 and C anatomical variations were considered to carry higher risks of bleeding due to injury to the posterior pelvic segment. These variations are characterized by vessels larger in diameter and a longer course of the posterior division along the posterior part of the greater sciatic notch (area often involved in unstable pelvic ring fractures). On the other hand, the type C variation showed a longer internal iliac artery separated from the bone with a thick layer of soft tissue, which suggested lower risk than was attributed to the dominant type A1 variation. It was not possible to evaluate type B2 variation because it is very rare and was not found in study material. In type A2 and B1 variations, the branches were separated from bony structures similarly to the dominant type A1 variation.
The cadaver study designed to assess the risk of bleeding associated with different morphological variations of the branching pattern of the internal iliac artery did not identify any anatomical arrangement that might carry a higher risk of injury to the vessels by free bone fragments of the posterior segment in unstable pelvic fractures. It can be concluded that less common branching patterns of the internal iliac artery are not associated with higher risk of bleeding than the dominant type A1 variation.
本研究旨在调查髂内动脉前后分支的解剖变异是否与骨盆后段损伤导致的不同出血风险相关。
对19具尸体进行研究。解剖区域包括从髂总动脉分叉至臀上动脉、臀下动脉和阴部内动脉起始处的髂内动脉。使用电子游标卡尺测量分叉与前支或后支各分支起始处之间的距离。还测定了每条血管的直径。将研究结果与文献中描述的变异进行比较。根据与骨骼的接近程度评估与髂内动脉及其分支不同解剖变异相关的出血风险程度。
髂内动脉分支有六种解剖变异。发现了其中四种:A1型在10个标本中记录到,A2型在6个标本中记录到,B1型在2个标本中记录到,C型在1个标本中记录到。未见到B2型和D型。
B2型和C型解剖变异被认为由于骨盆后段损伤而具有较高的出血风险。这些变异的特点是血管直径较大,后支沿坐骨大切迹后部走行较长(该区域常涉及不稳定骨盆环骨折)。另一方面,C型变异显示髂内动脉与骨骼分离且有一层厚厚的软组织,这表明其风险低于占主导地位的A1型变异。由于B2型变异非常罕见且在研究材料中未发现,因此无法对其进行评估。在A2型和B1型变异中,分支与骨结构的分离方式与占主导地位的A1型变异相似。
旨在评估与髂内动脉分支模式不同形态变异相关的出血风险的尸体研究未发现任何解剖结构会因不稳定骨盆骨折后段游离骨碎片而导致血管损伤风险更高。可以得出结论,髂内动脉较不常见的分支模式与出血风险增加无关,其出血风险并不高于占主导地位的A1型变异。