Smith Jordan R, Barber Katie E, Raut Animesh, Rybak Michael J
Anti-Infective Research Laboratory, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Anti-Infective Research Laboratory, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Detroit, Michigan, USA School of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015 May;59(5):2842-8. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00053-15. Epub 2015 Mar 9.
Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium are frequently resistant to vancomycin and β-lactams. In enterococcal infections with reduced glycopeptide susceptibility, combination therapy is often administered. Our objective was to conduct pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) models to evaluate β-lactam synergy with daptomycin (DAP) against resistant enterococci. One E. faecalis strain (R6981) and two E. faecium strains (R6370 and 8019) were evaluated. DAP MICs were obtained. All strains were evaluated for response to LL37, an antimicrobial peptide, in the presence and absence of ceftaroline (CPT), ertapenem (ERT), and ampicillin (AMP). After 96 h, in vitro models were run simulating 10 mg DAP/kg body weight/day, 600 mg CPT every 8 h (q8h), 2 g AMP q4h, and 1 g ERT q24h, both alone and in combination against all strains. DAP MICs were 2, 4, and 4 μg/ml for strains R6981, R6370, and 8019, respectively. PK/PD models demonstrated bactericidal activity with DAP-CPT, DAP-AMP, and DAP-ERT combinations against strain 8019 (P < 0.001 and log10 CFU/ml reduction of >2 compared to any single agent). Against strains R6981 and R6370, the DAP-AMP combination demonstrated enhancement against R6370 but not R6981, while the combinations of DAP-CPT and DAP-ERT were bactericidal, demonstrated enhancement, and were statistically superior to all other regimens at 96 h (P < 0.001) against both strains. CPT, ERT, and AMP similarly augmented LL37 killing against strain 8019. In strains R6981 and R6370, CPT and ERT aided LL37 more than AMP (P < 0.001). Compared to DAP alone, combination regimens provide better killing and prevent resistance. Clinical research involving DAP combinations is warranted.
粪肠球菌和屎肠球菌常常对万古霉素和β-内酰胺类药物耐药。在糖肽敏感性降低的肠球菌感染中,常采用联合治疗。我们的目的是建立药代动力学/药效学(PK/PD)模型,以评估β-内酰胺类药物与达托霉素(DAP)联合对抗耐药肠球菌的协同作用。评估了1株粪肠球菌(R6981)和2株屎肠球菌(R6370和8019)。测定了达托霉素的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)。在有和没有头孢洛林(CPT)、厄他培南(ERT)和氨苄西林(AMP)存在的情况下,评估了所有菌株对抗菌肽LL37的反应。96小时后,进行体外模型实验,模拟每日10mg DAP/kg体重、每8小时(q8h)600mg CPT、每4小时2g AMP和每24小时1g ERT单独及联合作用于所有菌株的情况。菌株R6981、R6370和8019的达托霉素MIC分别为2、4和4μg/ml。PK/PD模型显示,DAP-CPT、DAP-AMP和DAP-ERT联合用药对菌株8019具有杀菌活性(P<0.001,与任何单一药物相比,log10CFU/ml降低>2)。对于菌株R6981和R6370,DAP-AMP联合用药对R6370有增强作用,但对R6981没有,而DAP-CPT和DAP-ERT联合用药具有杀菌作用、显示出增强作用,并且在96小时时对这两种菌株在统计学上均优于所有其他治疗方案(P<0.001)。CPT、ERT和AMP同样增强了LL37对菌株8019的杀伤作用。在菌株R6981和R6370中,CPT和ERT对LL37的辅助作用比AMP更强(P<0.001)。与单独使用达托霉素相比,联合治疗方案具有更好的杀菌效果并能预防耐药性。有必要开展涉及达托霉素联合用药的临床研究。