Suppr超能文献

植入式心脏监测器引导下房颤导管消融术后的抗凝治疗

Anticoagulation after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation guided by implantable cardiac monitors.

作者信息

Zuern Christine S, Kilias Antonios, Berlitz Patrick, Seizer Peter, Gramlich Michael, Müller Karin, Duckheim Martin, Gawaz Meinrad, Schreieck Jürgen

机构信息

Abteilung Innere Medizin III, Department of Cardiology, Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

出版信息

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2015 Jun;38(6):688-93. doi: 10.1111/pace.12625. Epub 2015 Apr 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Discontinuation of oral anticoagulation (OAC) after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) is not recommended in patients with elevated CHADS2 scores. However, a low incidence of thromboembolic events is reported when OAC is stopped in these patients. We introduce an algorithm for discontinuation of OAC after ablation based on the AF burden documented by implantable cardiac monitors (ICM).

METHODS

Sixty-five patients with CHADS2 scores 1-3 free from AF 3 months after ablation (AF ablation [n = 49] or ablation of possible AF triggers [n = 16]) were included. One day after implantation of the ICM, OAC was stopped. Patients performed a daily interrogation of the ICM which was programmed to alarm the patient if daily AF burden exceeded 1 hour. Study end point was the first recurrence of a daily AF burden ≥1 hour or a thromboembolic event, which both triggered reinitiation of OAC.

RESULTS

During a follow-up time of 32 ± 12 months (126 patient-years), 41 of the 65 patients (63%) had an AF burden <1 h/day and were able to stay off OAC. Twenty-one patients (32%) had to reinitiate OAC due to an AF burden ≥1 hour and three patients due to other reasons. No stroke, transitory ischemic attack, or other thromboembolic event was observed during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Rhythm monitoring by ICM in patients who have stopped OAC after catheter ablation of AF or ablation of possible AF triggers seems to be a safe and promising method to monitor for AF recurrence. Within 1.3 years after ablation, about two-thirds of patients were able to stay off OAC.

摘要

背景

对于CHA2DS2-VASc评分升高的患者,不建议在房颤导管消融术后停用口服抗凝药(OAC)。然而,据报道这些患者停用OAC后血栓栓塞事件的发生率较低。我们引入了一种基于植入式心脏监测器(ICM)记录的房颤负荷来指导消融术后停用OAC的算法。

方法

纳入65例CHA2DS2-VASc评分1-3分、消融术后3个月无房颤的患者(房颤消融[n = 49]或可能的房颤触发因素消融[n = 16])。植入ICM后1天,停用OAC。患者每天对ICM进行问询,如果每日房颤负荷超过1小时,ICM会向患者发出警报。研究终点是每日房颤负荷≥1小时的首次复发或血栓栓塞事件,这两者均触发重新开始使用OAC。

结果

在32±12个月(126患者年)的随访期内,65例患者中有41例(63%)的房颤负荷<1小时/天,能够停用OAC。21例患者(32%)因房颤负荷≥1小时不得不重新开始使用OAC,3例患者因其他原因重新开始使用OAC。随访期间未观察到中风、短暂性脑缺血发作或其他血栓栓塞事件。

结论

对于房颤导管消融或可能的房颤触发因素消融后停用OAC的患者,通过ICM进行节律监测似乎是一种安全且有前景的监测房颤复发的方法。消融后1.3年内,约三分之二的患者能够停用OAC。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验