Packard Matthew, Gayou Olivier, Gurram Krishna, Weiss Brandon, Thakkar Shyam, Kirichenko Alexander
Department of Radiation Oncology, Lemmen-Holton Cancer Pavilion, Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny General Hospital, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2015 Aug;59(4):499-506. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.12294. Epub 2015 Mar 5.
Visualisation of soft tissues such as pancreatic tumours by mega-voltage cone beam CT (MV-CBCT) is frequently difficult and daily localisation is often based on more easily seen adjacent bony anatomy. Fiducial markers implanted into pancreatic tumours serve as surrogates for tumour position and may more accurately represent absolute tumour position. Differences in daily shifts based on alignment to implanted fiducial markers vs. alignment to adjacent bony anatomy were compared.
Gold fiducial markers were placed into the pancreatic tumour under endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guidance in 12 patients. Patients subsequently received image-guided intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IG-IMRT). MV-CBCT was performed prior to each fraction and isocentre shifts were performed based on alignment to the fiducial markers. We retrospectively reviewed archived MV-CBCT datasets and calculated shift differences in the left-right (LR), superior-inferior (SI) and anterior-posterior (AP) axes relative to shifts based on alignment to adjacent bony anatomy.
Two hundred forty-three fractions were analysed. The mean absolute difference in isocentre shifts between the fiducial markers and those aligned to bony anatomy was 3.4 mm (range 0-13 mm), 6.3 mm (range 0-21 mm) and 2.6 mm (range 0-12 mm), in LR, SI and AP directions, respectively. The mean three-dimensional vector shift difference between markers vs. bony anatomy alignment was 8.6 mm.
These data suggest that fiducial markers used in conjunction with MV-CBCT improve the accuracy of daily target delineation compared with localisation using adjacent bony anatomy and that gold fiducial markers using MV-CBCT alignment are a viable option for target localisation during IG-IMRT.
通过兆伏级锥形束CT(MV-CBCT)对胰腺肿瘤等软组织进行可视化检查通常很困难,日常定位往往基于更容易看到的相邻骨骼解剖结构。植入胰腺肿瘤的基准标记物可作为肿瘤位置的替代物,可能更准确地代表肿瘤的绝对位置。比较了基于与植入的基准标记物对齐和与相邻骨骼解剖结构对齐的每日位移差异。
在12例患者的内镜超声(EUS)引导下,将金基准标记物置于胰腺肿瘤内。患者随后接受图像引导的调强放射治疗(IG-IMRT)。每次分割前进行MV-CBCT,并根据与基准标记物的对齐进行等中心位移。我们回顾性分析了存档的MV-CBCT数据集,并计算了相对于基于与相邻骨骼解剖结构对齐的位移,在左右(LR)、上下(SI)和前后(AP)轴上的位移差异。
分析了243个分割。基准标记物与与骨骼解剖结构对齐的标记物之间等中心位移的平均绝对差异在LR、SI和AP方向分别为3.4毫米(范围0-13毫米)、6.3毫米(范围0-21毫米)和2.6毫米(范围0-12毫米)。标记物与骨骼解剖结构对齐之间的平均三维向量位移差异为8.6毫米。
这些数据表明,与使用相邻骨骼解剖结构进行定位相比,将基准标记物与MV-CBCT结合使用可提高每日靶区勾画的准确性,并且使用MV-CBCT对齐的金基准标记物是IG-IMRT期间靶区定位的可行选择。