Yagihashi Yusuke, Shimabukuro Shuichi, Arakaki Yoshitaka
Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi. 2014 Oct;105(4):196-201. doi: 10.5980/jpnjurol.105.196.
This study was aimed at determining the status of iatrogenic urethral injury associated with insertion of urethral catheters at our hospital.
We studied the data of 32 patients with iatrogenic urethral injury at our hospital. We also carried out a questionnaire survey of 150 nurses who could be in charge of urethral catheter insertions, and conducted an analysis based on the answers obtained from 133 of the 150 nurses (response rate 88.7%).
The 32 patients included 14 patients with reduced activity of daily living (ADL) who required assistance in daily life (44%), 4 patients with spinal cord injury (13%), and 4 patients under anesthesia or sedation (13%). Acute complications included sepsis in 5 patients (16%) and septic shock in 3 patients (9%). Long-term urethral catheterization was indicated in all the patients with sepsis. Examination of the responses to the questionnaire showed that while 86% of the nurses said "I inject water to fix the balloon after confirming urine outflow," 7% answered "I inject water into the balloon even if there is no urine outflow"; 46% said "I compress the lower abdomen when there is no urine outflow," 6% said "I perform urinary bladder irrigation," and 48% said "I neither compress the lower abdomen when there is no urinary flow nor perform urinary bladder irrigation".
Nearly half of the patients with iatrogenic urethral injury at our hospital had reduced ADL. In the patients in whom long-term catheterization was indicated, urethral injury at the time of regular replacement of a catheter was associated with a high likelihood of sepsis occurring as a complication. Based on the results of the questionnaire, more than 80% of the nurses complied with the rule that water to fix the balloon must be injected only after confirming urinary outflow at the time of inserting a urethral catheter. However, when there was no urine outflow after insertion of the catheter, there were variations in the procedure to handle the situation. In the education of nurses, training on the appropriate actions that must be taken in this situation appears to be important.
本研究旨在确定我院与尿道导管插入相关的医源性尿道损伤状况。
我们研究了我院32例医源性尿道损伤患者的数据。我们还对150名可能负责尿道导管插入的护士进行了问卷调查,并根据150名护士中133名的回答(回复率88.7%)进行了分析。
32例患者中,14例日常生活活动(ADL)能力下降,日常生活需要协助(44%),4例脊髓损伤患者(13%),4例处于麻醉或镇静状态的患者(13%)。急性并发症包括5例败血症(16%)和3例感染性休克(9%)。所有败血症患者均需长期留置尿道导管。对问卷回复的检查显示,86%的护士表示“确认有尿液流出后注入水固定球囊”,7%的护士回答“即使没有尿液流出也向球囊注水”;46%的护士表示“没有尿液流出时按压下腹部”,6%的护士表示“进行膀胱冲洗”,48%的护士表示“没有尿液流出时既不按压下腹部也不进行膀胱冲洗”。
我院近一半医源性尿道损伤患者的ADL能力下降。在需要长期留置导管的患者中,定期更换导管时发生尿道损伤会导致败血症作为并发症发生的可能性很高。根据问卷调查结果,超过80%的护士遵守在插入尿道导管时必须在确认有尿液流出后才注入水固定球囊的规则。然而,插入导管后没有尿液流出时,处理这种情况的操作存在差异。在护士培训中,针对这种情况必须采取的适当行动的培训似乎很重要。