[心脏骤停前及骤停后轻度低温对兔自主循环恢复后室颤心肌功能的影响]
[Effect of pre-arrest and post-arrest mild hypothermia on myocardial function of ventricular fibrillation after restoration of spontaneous circulation in rabbits].
作者信息
Li Yinping, Fan Zhenxing, Qin Jian, Jiang Li, Hua Qi, Li Jing
机构信息
Department of Emergency Medicine, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, China. Corresponding author: Qin Jian, Email:
出版信息
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2015 Mar;27(3):185-9. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2015.03.006.
OBJECTIVE
To study the effect of pre-arrest and post-arrest mild hypothermia after restoration of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) on myocardial function, ultrastructure, apoptosis of myocardial cells in rabbits with ventricular fibrillation.
METHODS
Sixty-two male New Zealand rabbits were randomly allocated into five groups: namely normothermic control group (NTC group, n = 10), hypothermia control group (HTC group, n = 10), normothermic resuscitation group (NTR group, n = 14), hypothermia pre-arrest group (HPRA group, n = 14), and hypothermia post-arrest group (HPOA group, n = 14). The normal temperature was controlled at (39.0 ± 0.5) centigrade, and the hypothermia (33.5±0.5) centigrade. Ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest (CA) was reproduced in rabbits by transcutaneous epicardium electrical stimulation. The parameters of hemodynamics were monitored dynamically for 4 hours in all the groups, including heart rate (HR), left ventricular end diastolic and systolic pressure (LVEDP/LVESP), maximal rate of increase/decrease in left ventricular pressure (±dp/dt max), and mean arterial pressure (MAP). The body temperature of rabbits in hypothermia groups was maintained by surface cooling for 4 hours followed by rewarming. The survived rabbits were sacrificed at 48 hours after resuscitation, and myocardial apical tissue was harvested for observation of ultrastructure with electronic microscope, and to observe apoptosis by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) staining.
RESULTS
(1) Resuscitation investigation: there was no significant difference in rate of ROSC, time of CPR and energy of defibrillation among HPRA, HPOA, and NTR groups [rate of ROSC: 85.71%, 71.43%, 71.43%; time of CPR (seconds): 45.3 ± 30.2, 61.2 ± 41.3, 82.3 ± 63.8; energy of defibrillation (J): 14.3 ± 8.9, 22.0 ± 15.5, 25.0 ± 15.8, all P > 0.05]. (2) Hemodynamics: compared with normal temperature groups, animals in hypothermia groups exhibited lower levels of HR (all P < 0.05). Compared with NTR group, HPRA group exhibited higher levels of LVESP (mmHg, 1 mmHg = 0.133 kPa) at 0.5, 1, 2 and 3 hours post ROSC (0.5 hour: 103.8 ± 14.3 vs. 91.6 ± 13.3, 1 hour: 107.2 ± 14.1 vs. 82.7 ± 8.5, 2 hours: 109.0 ± 16.9 vs. 88.8 ± 12.9, 3 hours: 109.1 ± 14.6 vs. 89.3 ± 14.3, all P < 0.05). Compared with NTR group and HPOA group, HPRA group exhibited lower levels of LVEDP (mmHg) at 0.5 hour post ROSC (3.70 ± 0.85 vs. 7.61 ± 2.73, 7.02 ± 3.12, both P < 0.05). Compared with NTR group, HPRA group exhibited lower levels of LVEDP at 1 hour post ROSC (4.34 ± 1.44 vs. 6.99±1.96, P < 0.05). In HPRA group, the level of +dp/dt max (mmHg/s) was higher than that of NTR group and HPOA group at 1 hour and 2 hours post ROSC (1 hour: 2 759.5 ± 321.6 vs. 2 123.0 ± 304.5, 2 283.7 ± 234.2, 2 hours: 2 730.6±425.1 vs. 2 221.5 ± 392.9, 2 252.6 ± 476.0, all P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in -dp/dt max and MAP levels among three CPR groups. (3) The survival rate at 48 hours post ROSC of NTR, HPRA and HPOA groups was 60%, 75%, and 100%, respectively. Compared with NTR group, higher survival rate was found in HPOA group at 48 hour post ROSC (P < 0.05). (4) Compared with NTR group, less damage to myocardial ultrastructure was found in HPRA and HPOA groups. Apoptosis index (AI) was lower in HPRA and HPOA groups than that in NTR group [(28.05 ± 9.82) %, (26.39 ± 8.98) % vs. (42.02 ± 13.36) %, both P < 0.05].
CONCLUSIONS
Our study shows that mild hypothermia has no effect on ROSC rate. Pre-arrest hypothermia can ameliorate myocardial systolic function of rabbit in early stage after ROSC, and it has no negative influence on diastolic function. Post-arrest mild hypothermia produces no negative influence on myocardial function of rabbit, but it improves 48 hours survival rate in ROSC rabbits. Both pre-arrest and post-arrest mild hypothermia therapy can attenuate myocardial injury in CA model of rabbits by ameliorating mitochondrial injuries and suppressing apoptosis of myocardial cells.
目的
研究心室颤动兔自主循环恢复(ROSC)前后轻度低温对心肌功能、超微结构及心肌细胞凋亡的影响。
方法
62只雄性新西兰兔随机分为五组:即常温对照组(NTC组,n = 10)、低温对照组(HTC组,n = 10)、常温复苏组(NTR组,n = 14)、低温预骤停组(HPRA组,n = 14)和低温后骤停组(HPOA组,n = 14)。正常体温控制在(39.0±0.5)℃,低温为(33.5±0.5)℃。通过经皮心外膜电刺激使兔发生心室颤动心脏骤停(CA)。所有组均动态监测血流动力学参数4小时,包括心率(HR)、左心室舒张末期和收缩期压力(LVEDP/LVESP)、左心室压力最大上升/下降速率(±dp/dt max)和平均动脉压(MAP)。低温组兔的体温通过体表降温维持4小时,然后复温。复苏后48小时处死存活的兔,取心肌心尖组织用电子显微镜观察超微结构,并用末端脱氧核苷酸转移酶介导的dUTP缺口末端标记(TUNEL)染色观察细胞凋亡。
结果
(1)复苏情况:HPRA组、HPOA组和NTR组的ROSC率、心肺复苏(CPR)时间和除颤能量无显著差异[ROSC率:85.71%、71.43%、71.43%;CPR时间(秒):45.3±30.2、61.2±41.3、82.3±63.8;除颤能量(焦耳):14.3±8.9、22.0±15.5、25.0±15.8,均P>0.05]。(2)血流动力学:与常温组相比,低温组动物的HR水平较低(均P<0.05)。与NTR组相比,HPRA组在ROSC后0.5小时、1小时、2小时和3小时的LVESP水平较高(0.5小时:103.8±14.3对91.6±13.3,1小时:107.2±14.1对82.7±8.5,2小时:109.0±16.9对88.8±12.9,3小时:109.1±14.6对89.3±14.3,均P<0.05)。与NTR组和HPOA组相比,HPRA组在ROSC后0.5小时的LVEDP水平较低(3.70±0.85对7.61±2.73、7.02±3.12,均P<0.05)。与NTR组相比,HPRA组在ROSC后1小时的LVEDP水平较低(4.34±1.44对6.99±1.96,P<0.05)。在HPRA组,ROSC后1小时和2小时的+dp/dt max(mmHg/s)水平高于NTR组和HPOA组(1小时:2759.5±321.6对2123.0±304.5、2283.7±234.2,2小时:2730.6±425.1对2221.5±392.9、2252.6±476.0,均P<0.05)。三个CPR组之间的-dp/dt max和MAP水平无显著差异。(3)ROSC后48小时NTR组、HPRA组和HPOA组的存活率分别为60%、75%和100%。与NTR组相比,HPOA组在ROSC后48小时的存活率较高(P<0.05)。(4)与NTR组相比,HPRA组和HPOA组的心肌超微结构损伤较小。HPRA组和HPOA组的凋亡指数(AI)低于NTR组[(28.05±9.82)%、(26.39±8.98)%对(42.02±13.36)%,均P<0.05]。
结论
本研究表明轻度低温对ROSC率无影响。预骤停低温可改善兔ROSC后早期的心肌收缩功能,且对舒张功能无负面影响。后骤停轻度低温对兔心肌功能无负面影响,但可提高ROSC兔48小时的存活率。预骤停和后骤停轻度低温治疗均可通过改善线粒体损伤和抑制心肌细胞凋亡减轻兔CA模型中的心肌损伤。