Rodger C. Haggitt Gastrointestinal and Hepatic Pathology Service, Department of Pathology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Center for Biomedical Statistics, Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2015 Mar 12;6(3):e81. doi: 10.1038/ctg.2015.7.
Dysplasia arising from Barrett's esophagus precedes esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Cases that are difficult to diagnose as dysplastic, especially in the setting of inflammation, may be designated "indefinite for dysplasia (IND)." Although flow cytometric analysis of DNA content has shown some promise in detecting EAC, there are few reports that have specifically evaluated the outcome of IND.
We analyzed a series of 96 IND patients seen at the University of Washington between 2005 and 2013 to determine the outcome of IND and to identify factors (including histologic features and DNA flow cytometric data) associated with subsequent detection of neoplasia.
Twenty-five percent of IND cases were found to have low-grade dysplasia, high-grade dysplasia (HGD), or EAC within 1 year, with 37% and 47% detected within 2 and 3 years, respectively. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year detection rates of HGD or EAC were 10%, 13%, and 20%, respectively. Active inflammation (hazard ratio (HR)=3.4, P=0.0005) and abnormal DNA content (HR=5.7, P=0.003) were significant risk factors of neoplasia. When active inflammation and DNA flow cytometric results were considered together, the HR for the combined markers was 18.8 (P<0.0001). The sensitivity and specificity of the combined markers for predicting detection of subsequent neoplasia within 3 years were 100% and 60%, respectively, with 100% negative and 89% positive predictive values.
Histology with the support of DNA flow cytometry can identify a subset of IND patients who may have a higher risk for subsequent detection of neoplasia.
巴雷特食管发生的异型增生先于食管腺癌(EAC)。在炎症背景下,一些难以诊断为异型增生的病例可能被指定为“异型增生不确定(IND)”。虽然 DNA 含量流式细胞分析在检测 EAC 方面显示出一定的前景,但很少有专门评估 IND 结果的报道。
我们分析了 2005 年至 2013 年期间在华盛顿大学就诊的 96 例 IND 患者,以确定 IND 的结果,并确定与随后检测到肿瘤相关的因素(包括组织学特征和 DNA 流式细胞术数据)。
25%的 IND 病例在 1 年内发现低级别异型增生、高级别异型增生(HGD)或 EAC,分别有 37%和 47%在 2 年和 3 年内发现。HGD 或 EAC 的 1 年、2 年和 3 年检测率分别为 10%、13%和 20%。活动性炎症(危险比(HR)=3.4,P=0.0005)和异常 DNA 含量(HR=5.7,P=0.003)是肿瘤发生的显著危险因素。当同时考虑活动性炎症和 DNA 流式细胞术结果时,联合标志物的 HR 为 18.8(P<0.0001)。联合标志物预测 3 年内随后发生肿瘤的敏感性和特异性分别为 100%和 60%,阴性预测值为 100%,阳性预测值为 89%。
组织学结合 DNA 流式细胞术可以识别出一组 IND 患者,他们可能有更高的风险随后检测到肿瘤。