Chan Carol, Woo Renée, Seto Winnie, Pong Sandra, Gilhooly Tessie, Russell Jennifer
BScPhm, ACPR, RPh, is with the Department of Pharmacy, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario.
BScPhm, PharmD, MSc, ACPR, RPh, is with the Department of Pharmacy, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario.
Can J Hosp Pharm. 2015 Jan-Feb;68(1):8-15. doi: 10.4212/cjhp.v68i1.1419.
Medication reconciliation reduces potential medication discrepancies and adverse drug events. The role of pharmacy technicians in obtaining best possible medication histories (BPMHs) and performing reconciliation at the admission and transfer interfaces of care for pediatric patients has not been described.
To compare the completeness and accuracy of BPMHs and reconciliation conducted by a pharmacy technician (pilot study) and by nurses and/or pharmacists (baseline). The severity of identified unintentional discrepancies was rated to determine their clinical importance.
This prospective cohort comparison study involved patients up to 18 years of age admitted to and/or transferred between the Cardiology ward and the Cardiac Critical Care Unit of a pediatric tertiary care teaching hospital. A pharmacy resident conducted two 3-week audits: the first to assess the completeness and accuracy of BPMHs and reconciliation performed by nurses and/or pharmacists and the second to assess the completeness and accuracy of BPMHs and reconciliation performed by a pharmacy technician.
The total number of patients was 38 in the baseline phase and 46 in the pilot period. There were no statistically significant differences between the baseline and pilot audits in terms of completion of BPMH (82% [28/34] versus 78% [21/27], p = 0.75) or completion of reconciliation (70% [23/33] versus 75% [15/20], p = 0.76) within 24 h of admission. Completeness of transfer reconciliation was significantly higher during the pilot study than at baseline (91% [31/34] versus 61% [11/18], p = 0.022). No significant differences between the baseline and pilot audits were found in the proportions of patients with at least one BPMH discrepancy (38% [13/34] versus 22% [6/27], p = 0.27), at least one unintentional discrepancy upon admission (21% [7/33] versus 10% [2/20], p = 0.46), or at least one unintentional discrepancy at the transfer interface (6% [1/18] versus 3% [1/34], p = 0.58). None of the 16 unintentional discrepancies were rated as causing severe patient discomfort or clinical deterioration.
A trained pharmacy technician can perform admission and transfer medication reconciliation for pediatric patients with completeness and accuracy comparable to those of nurses and pharmacists. Future studies should explore the sustainability and cost-effectiveness of this practice model.
用药核对可减少潜在的用药差异和药物不良事件。药剂师技术员在获取尽可能完善的用药史(BPMH)以及在儿科患者护理的入院和转科环节进行核对方面所发挥的作用尚未得到描述。
比较药剂师技术员(试点研究)与护士和/或药剂师(基线)进行的BPMH及核对的完整性和准确性。对所发现的无意差异的严重程度进行评级,以确定其临床重要性。
这项前瞻性队列比较研究纳入了一家儿科三级护理教学医院心内科病房和心脏重症监护病房收治和/或转科的18岁及以下患者。一名药学住院医师进行了两次为期3周的审核:第一次评估护士和/或药剂师进行的BPMH及核对的完整性和准确性,第二次评估药剂师技术员进行的BPMH及核对的完整性和准确性。
基线期患者总数为38例,试点期为46例。在入院24小时内,基线审核与试点审核在BPMH完成率(82%[28/34]对78%[21/27],p = 0.75)或核对完成率(70%[23/33]对75%[15/20],p = 0.76)方面无统计学显著差异。试点研究期间转科核对的完整性显著高于基线期(91%[31/34]对61%[11/18],p = 0.022)。在至少存在一项BPMH差异的患者比例(38%[13/34]对22%[6/27],p = 0.27)、入院时至少存在一项无意差异的患者比例(21%[7/33]对10%[2/20],p = 0.46)或转科环节至少存在一项无意差异的患者比例(6%[1/18]对3%[1/34],p = 0.58)方面,基线审核与试点审核之间均未发现显著差异。16项无意差异中,无一被评为会导致患者严重不适或临床病情恶化。
经过培训的药剂师技术员可为儿科患者进行入院和转科用药核对,其完整性和准确性与护士和药剂师相当。未来的研究应探讨这种实践模式的可持续性和成本效益。