Friso-van den Bos Ilona, Kroesbergen Evelyn H, Van Luit Johannes E H, Xenidou-Dervou Iro, Jonkman Lisa M, Van der Schoot Menno, Van Lieshout Ernest C D M
Department of Educational and Learning Sciences, Faculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Utrecht University, 3508 TC Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Department of Educational and Learning Sciences, Faculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Utrecht University, 3508 TC Utrecht, The Netherlands.
J Exp Child Psychol. 2015 Jun;134:12-29. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2015.02.002. Epub 2015 Mar 13.
Children's ability to relate number to a continuous quantity abstraction visualized as a number line is widely accepted to be predictive of mathematics achievement. However, a debate has emerged with respect to how children's placements are distributed on this number line across development. In the current study, different models were applied to children's longitudinal number placement data to get more insight into the development of number line representations in kindergarten and early primary school years. In addition, longitudinal developmental relations between number line placements and mathematical achievement, measured with a national test of mathematics, were investigated using cross-lagged panel modeling. A group of 442 children participated in a 3-year longitudinal study (ages 5-8 years) in which they completed a number-to-position task every 6 months. Individual number line placements were fitted to various models, of which a one-anchor power model provided the best fit for many of the placements at a younger age (5 or 6 years) and a two-anchor power model provided better fit for many of the children at an older age (7 or 8 years). The number of children who made linear placements also grew with age. Cross-lagged panel analyses indicated that the best fit was provided with a model in which number line acuity and mathematics performance were mutually predictive of each other rather than models in which one ability predicted the other in a non-reciprocal way. This indicates that number line acuity should not be seen as a predictor of math but that both skills influence each other during the developmental process.
儿童将数字与可视化为数轴的连续量抽象概念联系起来的能力,被广泛认为是数学成绩的预测指标。然而,关于儿童在数轴上的位置分布在整个发展过程中是如何变化的,已经出现了一场争论。在当前的研究中,不同的模型被应用于儿童的纵向数字位置数据,以便更深入地了解幼儿园和小学早期数轴表征的发展情况。此外,使用交叉滞后面板模型研究了数轴位置与数学成绩之间的纵向发展关系,数学成绩通过一项全国性数学测试来衡量。一组442名儿童参与了一项为期3年的纵向研究(年龄在5至8岁之间),他们每6个月完成一次数字到位置的任务。个体数轴位置被拟合到各种模型中,其中单锚幂模型对许多较年幼(5岁或6岁)儿童的位置拟合效果最佳,而双锚幂模型对许多较年长(7岁或8岁)儿童的拟合效果更好。进行线性定位的儿童数量也随着年龄的增长而增加。交叉滞后面板分析表明,最佳拟合模型是数轴敏锐度和数学成绩相互预测的模型,而不是一种能力以非互惠方式预测另一种能力的模型。这表明数轴敏锐度不应被视为数学的预测指标,而是这两种技能在发展过程中相互影响。