Suppr超能文献

Codacs™ 直接声学人工耳蜗植入器:探索替代刺激部位及其刺激效率。

The Codacs™ direct acoustic cochlear implant actuator: exploring alternative stimulation sites and their stimulation efficiency.

作者信息

Grossöhmichen Martin, Salcher Rolf, Kreipe Hans-Heinrich, Lenarz Thomas, Maier Hannes

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology and Institute of Audioneurotechnology (VIANNA), Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.

Institute for Pathology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2015 Mar 18;10(3):e0119601. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119601. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

This work assesses the efficiency of the Codacs system actuator (Cochlear Ltd., Sydney Australia) in different inner ear stimulation modalities. Originally the actuator was intended for direct perilymph stimulation after stapedotomy using a piston prosthesis. A possible alternative application is the stimulation of middle ear structures or the round window (RW). Here the perilymph stimulation with a K-piston through a stapes footplate (SFP) fenestration (N = 10) as well as stimulation of the stapes head (SH) with a Bell prosthesis (N = 9), SFP stimulation with an Omega/Aerial prosthesis (N = 8) and reverse RW stimulation (N = 10) were performed in cadaveric human temporal bones (TBs). Codacs actuator output is expressed as equivalent sound pressure level (eq. SPL) using RW and SFP displacement responses, measured by Laser Doppler velocimetry as reference. The axial actuator coupling force in stimulation of stapes and RW was adjusted to ~5 mN. The Bell prosthesis and Omega/Aerial prosthesis stimulation generated similar mean eq. SPLs (Bell: 127.5-141.8 eq. dB SPL; Omega/Aerial: 123.6-143.9 eq. dB SPL), being significantly more efficient than K-piston perilymph stimulation (108.6-131.6 eq. dB SPL) and RW stimulation (108.3-128.2 eq. dB SPL). Our results demonstrate that SH, SFP and RW are adequate alternative stimulation sites for the Codacs actuator using coupling prostheses and an axial coupling force of ~5 mN. Based on the eq. SPLs, all investigated methods were adequate for in vivo hearing aid applications, provided that experimental conditions including constant coupling force will be implemented.

摘要

本研究评估了Codacs系统驱动器(澳大利亚悉尼科利耳有限公司)在不同内耳刺激模式下的效率。该驱动器最初旨在使用活塞式假体在镫骨切除术后进行直接外淋巴刺激。一种可能的替代应用是刺激中耳结构或圆窗(RW)。在此,在尸体人颞骨(TBs)中进行了通过镫骨足板(SFP)开窗用K型活塞进行外淋巴刺激(N = 10),以及用贝尔假体刺激镫骨头(SH)(N = 9)、用欧米茄/天线假体进行SFP刺激(N = 8)和反向RW刺激(N = 10)。Codacs驱动器输出以等效声压级(eq. SPL)表示,使用激光多普勒测速仪测量的RW和SFP位移响应作为参考。在刺激镫骨和RW时,轴向驱动器耦合力调整为约5 mN。贝尔假体和欧米茄/天线假体刺激产生的平均eq. SPL相似(贝尔:127.5 - 141.8 eq. dB SPL;欧米茄/天线:123.6 - 143.9 eq. dB SPL),比K型活塞外淋巴刺激(108.6 - 131.6 eq. dB SPL)和RW刺激(108.3 - 128.2 eq. dB SPL)效率显著更高。我们的结果表明,使用耦联假体和约5 mN的轴向耦合力时,SH、SFP和RW是Codacs驱动器合适的替代刺激部位。基于eq. SPL,所有研究方法都适用于体内助听器应用,前提是包括恒定耦合力在内的实验条件将得到实施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba07/4364953/72e466796244/pone.0119601.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验