Suppr超能文献

开放性与微创性单纯前列腺切除术围手术期结果的全国性比较分析

A National, Comparative Analysis of Perioperative Outcomes of Open and Minimally Invasive Simple Prostatectomy.

作者信息

Parsons J Kellogg, Rangarajan Sriram S, Palazzi Kerrin, Chang David

机构信息

1 Department of Urology, UC San Diego Health System , La Jolla, California.

2 Urologic Cancer, UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center , La Jolla, California.

出版信息

J Endourol. 2015 Aug;29(8):919-24. doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0879. Epub 2015 Apr 15.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare perioperative outcomes of open (OSP) and minimally invasive (MISP) simple prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in a large national cohort using validated patient safety measures.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We studied patients undergoing simple prostatectomy for BPH in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 1998 to 2010 and used weighted sampling to estimate national trends. Patient safety indicators (PSI) and multivariable regression were used to generate adjusted odds ratios (ORadj) comparing OSP with MISP.

RESULTS

We identified 34,418 and 193 patients undergoing OSP and MISP, respectively. Although the overall frequency of simple prostatectomy cases decreased from 3157 cases in 1998 to 2227 cases in 2010, the annual frequency increased each year from 2008 to 2010. We focused on 2008 to 2010 for the comparative outcome analyses. Among all OSP cases during this period (n=6027), the transfusion prevalence was 21%. MISP patients were more likely to have higher Charlson comorbidity scores (P=0.11) and less likely to undergo transfusion (P=0.13), but these differences did not attain significance. There were no significant differences in median length of stay (LOS) (P=0.19), hospital charges (P=0.15), or unadjusted in-hospital mortality (P=0.73). PSI frequency was low, and did not differ significantly between groups (ORadj 1.59, 95% confidence interval 0.26 to 9.53, P=0.61).

CONCLUSIONS

In this, the first national analysis of simple prostatectomy, use of both OSP and MISP rose substantially from 2008 to 2010. Although transfusion prevalence was lower and LOS shorter for MISP, these differences did not attain significance. Further comparative analyses are needed.

摘要

目的

在一个大型全国队列中,使用经过验证的患者安全指标,比较开放性单纯前列腺切除术(OSP)和微创单纯前列腺切除术(MISP)治疗良性前列腺增生(BPH)的围手术期结果。

患者与方法

我们研究了1998年至2010年全国住院患者样本(NIS)中接受BPH单纯前列腺切除术的患者,并使用加权抽样来估计全国趋势。使用患者安全指标(PSI)和多变量回归来生成比较OSP与MISP的调整比值比(ORadj)。

结果

我们分别确定了34418例和193例接受OSP和MISP的患者。虽然单纯前列腺切除术病例的总体频率从1998年的3157例下降到2010年的2227例,但从2008年到2010年每年的频率都在增加。我们将2008年至2010年作为比较结果分析的重点。在此期间所有OSP病例(n = 6027)中,输血发生率为21%。MISP患者更有可能具有较高的Charlson合并症评分(P = 0.11),且输血可能性较小(P = 0.13),但这些差异未达到显著水平。中位住院时间(LOS)(P = 0.19)、住院费用(P = 0.15)或未调整的院内死亡率(P = 0.73)无显著差异。PSI频率较低,两组之间无显著差异(ORadj 1.59,95%置信区间0.26至9.53,P = 0.61)。

结论

在这项首次进行的全国性单纯前列腺切除术分析中,2008年至2010年期间OSP和MISP的使用均大幅增加。虽然MISP的输血发生率较低且住院时间较短,但这些差异未达到显著水平。需要进一步的比较分析。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验