Bankert Katherine C, Oxley Kyp L, Smith Sonja M, Graham John P, de Boer Mark, Thewissen Marielle, Simons Peter J, Bishop Gail A
Department of Microbiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242;
Interdisciplinary Graduate Program in Immunology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242;
J Immunol. 2015 May 1;194(9):4319-27. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1402903. Epub 2015 Mar 20.
Blocking the interaction of CD40 with its ligand CD154 is a desirable goal of therapies for preventing and/or ameliorating autoimmune diseases and transplant rejection. CD154-blocking mAbs used in human clinical trials resulted in unanticipated vascular complications, leading to heightened interest in the therapeutic potential of antagonist mAbs specific for human CD40. Abs that do not require physical competition with CD154 to inhibit CD40 signaling have particular therapeutic promise. In this study, we demonstrate that the antagonist anti-human CD40 mAb PG102 fails to trigger CD40-mediated activation, as well as impairs CD154-mediated CD40 activation, via a distinct nonstimulatory CD40 signaling mechanism. PG102 did not induce early CD40-induced signaling events, and it inhibited early kinase and transcription factor activation by CD154 or agonist anti-CD40 mAbs. However, PG102 stimulated normal CD40-mediated TNFR-associated factor (TRAF)2 and TRAF3 degradation. PG102 induced the formation of a CD40 signaling complex that contained decreased amounts of both TRAF2 and TRAF3 and TRAF2-associated signaling proteins. Additionally, PG102-induced CD40 signaling complexes failed to recruit TRAF6 to detergent-insoluble membrane fractions. Fab fragments of PG102, while retaining CD40 binding, did not induce TRAF degradation, nor could they inhibit CD154-stimulated B cell signaling, indicating that CD40 aggregation is required for the signaling inhibition induced by PG102. The antagonistic impact of PG102 on CD40 signaling reveals that the manner of CD40 ligation can determine sharply different outcomes for CD40 signaling and suggests that such information can be used to therapeutically manipulate these outcomes.
阻断CD40与其配体CD154的相互作用是预防和/或改善自身免疫性疾病及移植排斥反应治疗的理想目标。用于人体临床试验的CD154阻断单克隆抗体导致了意外的血管并发症,这使得人们对人CD40特异性拮抗剂单克隆抗体的治疗潜力产生了更大的兴趣。不需要与CD154进行物理竞争就能抑制CD40信号传导的抗体具有特殊的治疗前景。在本研究中,我们证明拮抗剂抗人CD40单克隆抗体PG102不会触发CD40介导的激活,并且通过一种独特的非刺激性CD40信号传导机制损害CD154介导的CD40激活。PG102不会诱导早期CD40诱导的信号事件,并且它抑制了CD154或激动剂抗CD40单克隆抗体引起的早期激酶和转录因子激活。然而,PG102刺激了正常的CD40介导的肿瘤坏死因子受体相关因子(TRAF)2和TRAF3降解。PG102诱导形成一种CD40信号复合物,该复合物中TRAF2和TRAF3以及与TRAF2相关的信号蛋白含量均降低。此外,PG102诱导的CD40信号复合物未能将TRAF6募集到去污剂不溶性膜组分中。PG102的Fab片段虽然保留了与CD40的结合能力,但不会诱导TRAF降解,也不能抑制CD154刺激的B细胞信号传导,这表明PG102诱导的信号抑制需要CD40聚集。PG102对CD40信号传导的拮抗作用表明,CD40连接的方式可以决定CD40信号传导截然不同的结果,并表明此类信息可用于治疗性地操控这些结果。