Suppr超能文献

在重症监护病房住院期间接受米卡芬净治疗的患者

[Patients treated with micafungin during their stay in intensive care unit].

作者信息

Álvarez-Lerma F, Grau S, López C, Jiménez J D, Trasmonte M V, Nieto M, Parra G, Herrero E

机构信息

Servicio de Medicina Intensiva, Hospital del Mar, Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, España.

Servicio de Farmacia, Hospital del Mar, Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, España.

出版信息

Med Intensiva. 2015 Nov;39(8):467-76. doi: 10.1016/j.medin.2014.10.010. Epub 2015 Mar 20.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine the reasons of prescription, the characteristics of patients and factors that affected the outcome of critically ill patients treated with micafungin (MCF) during their stay in Spanish ICUs.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Observational, retrospective and multicenter study. Patients admitted to the ICU between March 2011 and October 2012 (20-month period) treated with MCF for any reason were included in the study. Severity of patients at the beginning of treatment was measured with the APACHE II, SOFA, Child-Pugh and MELD scores. Reasons for the use of MCF were classified as prophylaxis, preemptive treatment, empirical treatment and directed treatment. Continuous variables are expressed as mean and standard deviation or median, and categorical variables as percentages. A multivariate analysis was performed to identify variables related to intra-ICU mortality.

RESULTS

The study population included 139 patients admitted to 19 Spanish ICUs, with a mean age of 57.3 (17.1) years, 89 (64%) men, with surgical (53.2%) and/or medical (44.6%) conditions, APACHE II score of 20.6 (7.7) and SOFA score of 8.4 (4.3), with 84.2% of patients requiring mechanical ventilation, 59% parenteral nutrition, 37.4% extrarenal depuration procedures and 37.4% treatment with steroids. MCF was indicated as empirical treatment of a proven infection in 51 (36.7%) cases, pre-emptive treatment in 50 (36%) especially as a result of the application of the Candida score (32 cases), directed treatment of fungal infection in 23 (16.5%) and as prophylactic treatment in 15 (10.8%) cases. In 108 (77%) cases, a daily dose of 100mg was administered, with a loading dose in only 9 cases (6.5%). The mean duration of treatment was 13.1 (13) days. A total of 59 (42.4%) patients died during their stay in the ICU and 16 after ICU discharge (hospital mortality 53.9%). Independent risk factors for intra-ICU mortality were the Child-Pugh score (OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.162-1.813; P=.001) and the MELD score (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.011-1.099; P=.014).

CONCLUSIONS

MCF is usually administered at a dose of 100mg/day, without loading dose and in 72.7% of cases as pre-emptive or empirical treatment. Factors that better predicted mortality were indicators of liver insufficiency at the time of starting treatment.

摘要

目的

确定西班牙重症监护病房(ICU)中接受米卡芬净(MCF)治疗的危重症患者在住院期间的处方原因、患者特征以及影响治疗结果的因素。

材料与方法

观察性、回顾性多中心研究。纳入2011年3月至2012年10月(20个月期间)因任何原因在ICU接受MCF治疗的患者。治疗开始时患者的严重程度用急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统(APACHE II)、序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)、Child-Pugh评分和终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分来衡量。使用MCF的原因分为预防、抢先治疗、经验性治疗和针对性治疗。连续变量以均值和标准差或中位数表示,分类变量以百分比表示。进行多变量分析以确定与ICU内死亡率相关的变量。

结果

研究人群包括19个西班牙ICU收治的139例患者,平均年龄57.3(17.1)岁,男性89例(64%),患有外科(53.2%)和/或内科(44.6%)疾病,APACHE II评分为20.6(7.7),SOFA评分为8.4(4.3),84.2%的患者需要机械通气,59%需要肠外营养,37.4%需要肾外净化程序,37.4%接受类固醇治疗。MCF在51例(36.7%)病例中作为已证实感染的经验性治疗,50例(36%)作为抢先治疗,特别是由于应用念珠菌评分(32例),23例(16.5%)作为真菌感染的针对性治疗,15例(10.8%)作为预防性治疗。108例(77%)病例中,每日剂量为100mg,仅9例(6.5%)给予负荷剂量。平均治疗持续时间为13.1(13)天。共有59例(42.4%)患者在ICU住院期间死亡,16例在ICU出院后死亡(医院死亡率53.9%)。ICU内死亡的独立危险因素是Child-Pugh评分(比值比1.45,95%置信区间1.162 - 1.813;P = 0.001)和MELD评分(比值比1.05,95%置信区间1.011 - 1.099;P = 0.014)。

结论

MCF通常以每日100mg的剂量给药,不给予负荷剂量,72.7%的病例作为抢先或经验性治疗。治疗开始时更好地预测死亡率的因素是肝功能不全指标。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验