Lam Janni Uyen Hoa, Lynge Elsebeth, Njor Sisse Helle, Rebolj Matejka
a Department of Public Health , University of Copenhagen , Copenhagen , Denmark.
Acta Oncol. 2015;54(8):1136-43. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2015.1016625. Epub 2015 Mar 24.
The incidence rates of cervical cancer and the coverage in cervical cancer screening are usually reported by including in the denominator all women from the general population. However, after hysterectomy women are not at risk anymore of developing cervical cancer. Therefore, it makes sense to determine the indicators also for the true at-risk populations. We described the frequency of total hysterectomy in Denmark and its impact on the calculated incidence of cervical cancer and the screening coverage.
With data from five Danish population-based registries, the incidence rate of cervical cancer and the screening coverage for women aged 23-64 years on 31 December 2010 were calculated with and without adjustments for hysterectomies undertaken for reasons other than cervical cancer. They were calculated as the number of cases divided by 1) the total number of woman-years from the general population; and 2) the at-risk population after exclusion of post-hysterectomy woman-years. Cases were defined as women with cervical cancer (incidence), or as women screened in the recommended interval, with or without adjustment for hysterectomies (coverage).
In 2010, the all-age prevalence of hysterectomy was estimated at 6%, and ≥ 16% at age ≥ 65. This translated into an overall 6% increase in the incidence rate of cervical cancer, from 12.8 (unadjusted) to 13.5 (adjusted) per 100,000 woman-years. The screening coverage increased from 76% (unadjusted) to 79% (adjusted). In Denmark, hysterectomies do not have a large overall impact on the calculated cancer incidence and screening coverage. Nevertheless, at ≥ 65 years adjusted rates would increase by almost 20% compared to unadjusted rates. This suggests that calculating disease risks per organ-years may have a role in understanding the true burden of the disease in a population at risk of developing that disease.
宫颈癌的发病率以及宫颈癌筛查的覆盖率通常是通过将普通人群中的所有女性纳入分母来报告的。然而,子宫切除术后的女性不再有患宫颈癌的风险。因此,为真正的高危人群确定指标是有意义的。我们描述了丹麦全子宫切除术的频率及其对计算出的宫颈癌发病率和筛查覆盖率的影响。
利用来自丹麦五个基于人群的登记处的数据,计算了2010年12月31日年龄在23 - 64岁的女性在有无因宫颈癌以外原因进行子宫切除术调整情况下的宫颈癌发病率和筛查覆盖率。计算方法为病例数除以1)普通人群中的女性总人年数;2)排除子宫切除术后人年数后的高危人群。病例定义为患有宫颈癌的女性(发病率),或在推荐间隔内接受筛查的女性,有无子宫切除术调整情况(覆盖率)。
2010年,子宫切除术的全年龄患病率估计为6%,65岁及以上年龄组≥16%。这导致宫颈癌发病率总体上升6%,从每100,000女性人年12.8例(未调整)增至13.5例(调整后)。筛查覆盖率从76%(未调整)增至79%(调整后)。在丹麦,子宫切除术对计算出的癌症发病率和筛查覆盖率总体影响不大。然而,在65岁及以上年龄组,调整后的发病率与未调整的发病率相比将增加近20%。这表明按器官人年计算疾病风险可能有助于了解有患该疾病风险人群中该疾病的真实负担。