Witharana E W R A, Wijesinghe S K J, Pradeepa K S M, Karunaratne W A I P, Jayasinghe S
Base Hospital, Deniyaya, Sri Lanka.
Ceylon Med J. 2015 Mar;60(1):5-9. doi: 10.4038/cmj.v60i1.7406.
To describe wasp and bee species that sting humans, analyse risk factors and clinical features.
A prospective observational study was conducted on patients presenting to Base Hospital Deniyaya with suspected bee and wasp stings from 2011 to 2013. Data were gathered using a questionnaire and specimens of offending insects collected for identification. When the insect specimen was unavailable, identification was made by the victim selecting (without prompting) from several dead specimens presented by the first author.
There were 322 patients (mean age: 42.5 years, SD: 15.1, 173 [53.7%] males). Insects were brought by 55 (17%) and 267 (83%) were identified using specimens. All occurred during day-time, 142 (44.1%) during August and September, and 200 victims (62%) were tea plantation workers. Majority (78.9%) reported a localized painful self-limiting swelling without systemic features and 15 (4.6%) developed anaphylactic shock. None died. Five specimens were available from those in anaphylactic shock (four Apis dorsata, one Ropalidia marginata). Vespa tropica stinging caused a characteristic skin lesion. Of the 55 specimens, 46 (83.6%) were Apis dorsata (Giant honey-bee, ''Bambara''), 8 (14.5%) Vespa tropica (Greater banded hornet, ''Debara'') and one Ropalidia marginata (Paper wasp, ''Kaladuruwa'').
Only three hymenoptera species stings were reported. Risk factors included day-time outdoor activities, occupation (tea plantation workers) and period of year. The latter may be due to pollen season when the insects are found in abundance. Only 4.6% of the patients developed anaphylactic shock. Vespa tropica stings led to a unique skin lesion.
描述蜇人的黄蜂和蜜蜂种类,分析危险因素及临床特征。
对2011年至2013年因疑似蜜蜂和黄蜂蜇伤就诊于德尼亚亚基地医院的患者进行前瞻性观察研究。通过问卷调查收集数据,并收集致伤昆虫标本用于鉴定。当无法获得昆虫标本时,由受害者从第一作者提供的几只死标本中(无提示)挑选来进行鉴定。
共有322例患者(平均年龄:42.5岁,标准差:15.1,男性173例[53.7%])。55例(17%)患者带来了昆虫,267例(83%)通过标本鉴定。所有蜇伤均发生在白天,142例(44.1%)发生在8月和9月,200名受害者(62%)为茶园工人。大多数(78.9%)报告有局部疼痛性自限性肿胀,无全身症状,15例(4.6%)发生过敏性休克。无人死亡。过敏性休克患者中有5份标本可供检测(4份黑大蜜蜂,1份缘腹胡蜂)。热带胡蜂蜇伤导致特征性皮肤损伤。在55份标本中,46份(83.6%)为黑大蜜蜂(巨型蜜蜂,“班巴拉”),8份(14.5%)为热带胡蜂(大胡蜂,“德巴拉”),1份为缘腹胡蜂(纸黄蜂,“卡拉杜瓦”)。
仅报告了三种膜翅目昆虫蜇伤。危险因素包括白天户外活动、职业(茶园工人)和一年中的时间段。后者可能是由于昆虫大量出现的花粉季节。仅4.6%的患者发生过敏性休克。热带胡蜂蜇伤导致独特的皮肤损伤。